Demographics details for Fort atkinson, WI vs Methuen, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fort atkinson, WI vs Methuen, MA.

Data Fort atkinson Methuen
Population 12,412 53,241
Median Age 42.0 years 40.6 years
Median Income $72,215 $93,681
Married Families 41.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 9% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.6

Population Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Methuen

  • The population in Methuen is higher at 53,241, compared to 12,412 in Fort atkinson.
  • Residents in Fort atkinson have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 40.6 years in Methuen.
  • Methuen has a higher median income of $93,681, compared to $72,215 in Fort atkinson.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fort atkinson at 41.0% compared to 39.0% in Methuen.
  • Fort atkinson has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Methuen.
  • Methuen has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.

Demographics

Demographics Fort atkinson vs Methuen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fort atkinson Methuen
Black Data is updating 5
White 89 51
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic 8 30
Two or More Races 3 10
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Methuen

  • In Methuen, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • Fort atkinson has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 51% in Methuen.
  • In Methuen, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Fort atkinson.
  • Methuen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 8% in Fort atkinson.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Methuen at 10%, compared to 3% in Fort atkinson.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fort atkinson and Methuen at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fort atkinson Methuen
Mental Health Not Good 15.2% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 10.2% 9.8%
Depression 23.6% 23.4%
Smoking 16.0% 14.1%
Binge Drinking 23.5% 17.7%
Obesity 34.0% 30.4%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Methuen

  • In Methuen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.2% in Fort atkinson.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fort atkinson at 23.6% compared to 23.4% in Methuen.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fort atkinson at 16.0% compared to 14.1% in Methuen.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 17.7% in Methuen.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fort atkinson at 34.0% compared to 30.4% in Methuen.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fort atkinson at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Methuen.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fort atkinson Methuen
No Schooling 1.3% (160) 1.4% (741)
High School Diploma 20.8% (2,578) 17.4% (9,266)
Less than High School 12.9% (1,595) 13.9% (7,384)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.6% (2,436) 21.3% (11,336)

Education Levels Comparison: Fort atkinson vs Methuen

  • In Methuen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.3% in Fort atkinson.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fort atkinson hold a high school diploma at 20.8% compared to 17.4% in Methuen.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Methuen at 13.9%, compared to 12.9% in Fort atkinson.
  • In Methuen, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 19.6% in Fort atkinson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.