Demographics details for Fords, NJ vs Bossier city, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fords, NJ vs Bossier city, LA.
| Data | Fords | Bossier city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,663 | 62,635 |
| Median Age | 39.3 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $110,643 | $54,100 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Fords vs Bossier city
- The population in Bossier city is higher at 62,635, compared to 12,663 in Fords.
- Residents in Fords have a higher median age of 39.3 years compared to 35.1 years in Bossier city.
- Fords has a higher median income of $110,643 compared to $54,100 in Bossier city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fords at 41.0% compared to 35.0% in Bossier city.
- The poverty level is higher in Bossier city at 17%, compared to 8% in Fords.
- The unemployment rate in Fords is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.1% in Bossier city.
Demographics
Demographics Fords vs Bossier city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fords | Bossier city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 28 |
| White | 32 | 54 |
| Asian | 18 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 24 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fords vs Bossier city
- In Bossier city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 28% compared to 15% in Fords.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bossier city at 54% compared to 32% in Fords.
- The Asian population is larger in Fords at 18% compared to 2% in Bossier city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fords at 24% compared to 10% in Bossier city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fords at 10% compared to 6% in Bossier city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fords at 1% compared to 0% in Bossier city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fords | Bossier city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 13.6% |
| Depression | 18.3% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 11.9% | 21.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fords vs Bossier city
- In Bossier city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 14.2% in Fords.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bossier city at 25.0% versus 18.3% in Fords.
- Bossier city has a higher smoking rate at 21.2% compared to 11.9% in Fords.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bossier city at 16.9% compared to 14.4% in Fords.
- Bossier city has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 28.6% in Fords.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bossier city at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Fords.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fords | Bossier city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (115) | 0.6% (400) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (1,923) | 17.8% (11,155) |
| Less than High School | 12.1% (1,536) | 11.7% (7,331) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.4% (3,345) | 16.1% (10,063) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fords vs Bossier city
- A higher percentage of residents in Fords have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.6% in Bossier city.
- In Bossier city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 15.2% in Fords.
- More residents in Fords have less than a high school education at 12.1% compared to 11.7% in Bossier city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fords hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.4% compared to 16.1% in Bossier city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.