Demographics details for Footville, WI vs Sterling heights, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Footville, WI vs Sterling heights, MI.

Data Footville Sterling heights
Population 837 132,567
Median Age 42.2 years 41.2 years
Median Income $61,250 $75,381
Married Families 53.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 10% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.7

Population Comparison: Footville vs Sterling heights

  • The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 837 in Footville.
  • Residents in Footville have a higher median age of 42.2 years compared to 41.2 years in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381, compared to $61,250 in Footville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Footville at 53.0% compared to 45.0% in Sterling heights.
  • Footville has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.5% in Footville.

Demographics

Demographics Footville vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Footville Sterling heights
Black Data is updating 6
White 90 79
Asian Data is updating 9
Hispanic 5 2
Two or More Races 5 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Footville vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Footville.
  • Footville has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 79% in Sterling heights.
  • In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Footville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Footville at 5% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Footville at 5% compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Footville and Sterling heights at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Footville Sterling heights
Mental Health Not Good 14.6% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 9.9% 11.4%
Depression 25.1% 25.5%
Smoking 16.0% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 24.6% 17.7%
Obesity 33.3% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 18.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Footville vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.6% in Footville.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling heights at 25.5% versus 25.1% in Footville.
  • Sterling heights has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 16.0% in Footville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Footville at 24.6% compared to 17.7% in Sterling heights.
  • Sterling heights has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 33.3% in Footville.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Footville at 18.0% compared to 13.0% in Sterling heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Footville Sterling heights
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.4% (3,134)
High School Diploma 33.8% (283) 18.8% (24,937)
Less than High School 24.4% (204) 16.6% (22,008)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.2% (94) 22.3% (29,518)

Education Levels Comparison: Footville vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 0.0% in Footville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Footville hold a high school diploma at 33.8% compared to 18.8% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents in Footville have less than a high school education at 24.4% compared to 16.6% in Sterling heights.
  • In Sterling heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 11.2% in Footville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.