Demographics details for Fontana, CA vs Spokane valley, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fontana, CA vs Spokane valley, WA.

Data Fontana Spokane valley
Population 212,475 107,325
Median Age 32.6 years 37.4 years
Median Income $93,230 $66,483
Married Families 36.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 13% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 4.1

Population Comparison: Fontana vs Spokane valley

  • In Fontana, the population is higher at 212,475, compared to 107,325 in Spokane valley.
  • The median age in Spokane valley is higher at 37.4 years, compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
  • Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230 compared to $66,483 in Spokane valley.
  • In Spokane valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 36.0% in Fontana.
  • Fontana has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 10% in Spokane valley.
  • The unemployment rate in Fontana is higher at 5.0%, compared to 4.1% in Spokane valley.

Demographics

Demographics Fontana vs Spokane valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fontana Spokane valley
Black 8 1
White 2 82
Asian 7 2
Hispanic 68 7
Two or More Races 14 7
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Fontana vs Spokane valley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fontana at 8% compared to 1% in Spokane valley.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Spokane valley at 82% compared to 2% in Fontana.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fontana at 7% compared to 2% in Spokane valley.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fontana at 68% compared to 7% in Spokane valley.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fontana at 14% compared to 7% in Spokane valley.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fontana and Spokane valley at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fontana Spokane valley
Mental Health Not Good 16.2% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 12.6% 11.5%
Depression 17.0% 28.7%
Smoking 12.4% 15.3%
Binge Drinking 15.1% 18.5%
Obesity 38.6% 29.7%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fontana vs Spokane valley

  • In Spokane valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.2% in Fontana.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Spokane valley at 28.7% versus 17.0% in Fontana.
  • Spokane valley has a higher smoking rate at 15.3% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Spokane valley at 18.5% compared to 15.1% in Fontana.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fontana at 38.6% compared to 29.7% in Spokane valley.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Spokane valley at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fontana Spokane valley
No Schooling 2.2% (4,748) 0.6% (596)
High School Diploma 16.3% (34,556) 15.6% (16,779)
Less than High School 25.3% (53,655) 7.2% (7,741)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.0% (25,587) 17.1% (18,346)

Education Levels Comparison: Fontana vs Spokane valley

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fontana have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.6% in Spokane valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fontana hold a high school diploma at 16.3% compared to 15.6% in Spokane valley.
  • More residents in Fontana have less than a high school education at 25.3% compared to 7.2% in Spokane valley.
  • In Spokane valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 12.0% in Fontana.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.