Demographics details for Fontana, CA vs Bradenton, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fontana, CA vs Bradenton, FL.
| Data | Fontana | Bradenton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 212,475 | 56,961 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 45.4 years |
| Median Income | $93,230 | $55,795 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Fontana vs Bradenton
- In Fontana, the population is higher at 212,475, compared to 56,961 in Bradenton.
- The median age in Bradenton is higher at 45.4 years, compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
- Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230 compared to $55,795 in Bradenton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fontana at 36.0% compared to 34.0% in Bradenton.
- Fontana has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Bradenton.
- The unemployment rate in Fontana is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.6% in Bradenton.
Demographics
Demographics Fontana vs Bradenton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fontana | Bradenton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 14 |
| White | 2 | 54 |
| Asian | 7 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 68 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fontana vs Bradenton
- In Bradenton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 14% compared to 8% in Fontana.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bradenton at 54% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- The Asian population is larger in Fontana at 7% compared to 2% in Bradenton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fontana at 68% compared to 22% in Bradenton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fontana at 14% compared to 8% in Bradenton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fontana at 1% compared to 0% in Bradenton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fontana | Bradenton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 17.0% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 12.4% | 21.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 38.6% | 33.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fontana vs Bradenton
- In Bradenton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.2% in Fontana.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bradenton at 20.1% versus 17.0% in Fontana.
- Bradenton has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bradenton at 15.3% compared to 15.1% in Fontana.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fontana at 38.6% compared to 33.2% in Bradenton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bradenton at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fontana | Bradenton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.2% (4,748) | 0.9% (506) |
| High School Diploma | 16.3% (34,556) | 19.3% (10,990) |
| Less than High School | 25.3% (53,655) | 15.2% (8,653) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.0% (25,587) | 19.3% (10,990) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fontana vs Bradenton
- A higher percentage of residents in Fontana have no formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.9% in Bradenton.
- In Bradenton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 16.3% in Fontana.
- More residents in Fontana have less than a high school education at 25.3% compared to 15.2% in Bradenton.
- In Bradenton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 12.0% in Fontana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.