Demographics details for Folsom, CA vs Federal way, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Folsom, CA vs Federal way, WA.
| Data | Folsom | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 83,269 | 97,863 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 37.4 years |
| Median Income | $134,935 | $80,360 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Folsom vs Federal way
- The population in Federal way is higher at 97,863, compared to 83,269 in Folsom.
- Residents in Folsom have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 37.4 years in Federal way.
- Folsom has a higher median income of $134,935 compared to $80,360 in Federal way.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Folsom at 44.0% compared to 39.0% in Federal way.
- The poverty level is higher in Federal way at 9%, compared to 7% in Folsom.
- Federal way has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 3.8% in Folsom.
Demographics
Demographics Folsom vs Federal way provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Folsom | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 17 |
| White | 54 | 34 |
| Asian | 18 | 15 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Folsom vs Federal way
- In Federal way, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 4% in Folsom.
- Folsom has a higher percentage of White residents at 54% compared to 34% in Federal way.
- The Asian population is larger in Folsom at 18% compared to 15% in Federal way.
- Federal way has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 14% in Folsom.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Federal way at 14%, compared to 10% in Folsom.
- In Federal way, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Folsom.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Folsom | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 24.7% |
| Smoking | 9.5% | 12.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 28.0% | 27.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Folsom vs Federal way
- In Federal way, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 13.9% in Folsom.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Federal way at 24.7% versus 17.7% in Folsom.
- Federal way has a higher smoking rate at 12.7% compared to 9.5% in Folsom.
- Binge drinking is more common in Folsom at 17.8% compared to 16.5% in Federal way.
- Obesity rates are higher in Folsom at 28.0% compared to 27.2% in Federal way.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Federal way at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Folsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Folsom | Federal way |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (451) | 1.8% (1,735) |
| High School Diploma | 7.7% (6,439) | 15.3% (15,003) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (5,119) | 11.0% (10,805) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.4% (30,311) | 21.2% (20,761) |
Education Levels Comparison: Folsom vs Federal way
- In Federal way, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.5% in Folsom.
- In Federal way, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.3% compared to 7.7% in Folsom.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Federal way at 11.0%, compared to 6.1% in Folsom.
- A higher percentage of residents in Folsom hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.4% compared to 21.2% in Federal way.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.