Demographics details for Folsom, CA vs Cedar lake, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Folsom, CA vs Cedar lake, IN.
| Data | Folsom | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 83,269 | 15,592 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $134,935 | $84,444 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Folsom vs Cedar lake
- In Folsom, the population is higher at 83,269, compared to 15,592 in Cedar lake.
- Residents in Folsom have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 39.5 years in Cedar lake.
- Folsom has a higher median income of $134,935 compared to $84,444 in Cedar lake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Folsom at 44.0% compared to 40.0% in Cedar lake.
- Folsom has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 5% in Cedar lake.
- The unemployment rate in Folsom is higher at 3.8%, compared to 3.5% in Cedar lake.
Demographics
Demographics Folsom vs Cedar lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Folsom | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | Data is updating |
| White | 54 | 94 |
| Asian | 18 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 14 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Folsom vs Cedar lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Folsom at 4% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar lake at 94% compared to 54% in Folsom.
- The Asian population is larger in Folsom at 18% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Folsom at 14% compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Folsom at 10% compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Folsom and Cedar lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Folsom | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.9% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 9.5% | 18.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 28.0% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Folsom vs Cedar lake
- In Cedar lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 13.9% in Folsom.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar lake at 25.4% versus 17.7% in Folsom.
- Cedar lake has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 9.5% in Folsom.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar lake at 19.8% compared to 17.8% in Folsom.
- Cedar lake has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 28.0% in Folsom.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cedar lake at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Folsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Folsom | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (451) | 0.4% (67) |
| High School Diploma | 7.7% (6,439) | 21.1% (3,292) |
| Less than High School | 6.1% (5,119) | 7.1% (1,102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 36.4% (30,311) | 14.1% (2,204) |
Education Levels Comparison: Folsom vs Cedar lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Folsom have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Cedar lake.
- In Cedar lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 7.7% in Folsom.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cedar lake at 7.1%, compared to 6.1% in Folsom.
- A higher percentage of residents in Folsom hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.4% compared to 14.1% in Cedar lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.