Demographics details for Florham park, NJ vs Pleasanton, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Florham park, NJ vs Pleasanton, CA.
| Data | Florham park | Pleasanton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,325 | 76,689 |
| Median Age | 41.7 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $141,620 | $181,639 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Florham park vs Pleasanton
- The population in Pleasanton is higher at 76,689, compared to 13,325 in Florham park.
- Residents in Florham park have a higher median age of 41.7 years compared to 41.5 years in Pleasanton.
- Pleasanton has a higher median income of $181,639, compared to $141,620 in Florham park.
- In Pleasanton, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 39.0% in Florham park.
- The poverty level is higher in Pleasanton at 7%, compared to 0% in Florham park.
- Pleasanton has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 4.2% in Florham park.
Demographics
Demographics Florham park vs Pleasanton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Florham park | Pleasanton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 2 |
| White | 69 | 37 |
| Asian | 9 | 42 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Florham park vs Pleasanton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Florham park at 7% compared to 2% in Pleasanton.
- Florham park has a higher percentage of White residents at 69% compared to 37% in Pleasanton.
- In Pleasanton, the Asian population stands at 42%, greater than 9% in Florham park.
- Pleasanton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 10% in Florham park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pleasanton at 7%, compared to 5% in Florham park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Florham park and Pleasanton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Florham park | Pleasanton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.6% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.1% | 7.3% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 17.6% |
| Smoking | 10.4% | 7.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.2% |
| Obesity | 24.7% | 22.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Florham park vs Pleasanton
- More residents in Florham park report poor mental health at 13.6% compared to 13.1% in Pleasanton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Florham park at 19.6% compared to 17.6% in Pleasanton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Florham park at 10.4% compared to 7.2% in Pleasanton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Florham park at 18.9% compared to 17.2% in Pleasanton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Florham park at 24.7% compared to 22.9% in Pleasanton.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Florham park and Pleasanton at 8.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Florham park | Pleasanton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (52) | 0.5% (407) |
| High School Diploma | 8.1% (1,076) | 6.2% (4,722) |
| Less than High School | 1.9% (248) | 3.8% (2,941) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.4% (5,654) | 49.3% (37,825) |
Education Levels Comparison: Florham park vs Pleasanton
- In Pleasanton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Florham park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Florham park hold a high school diploma at 8.1% compared to 6.2% in Pleasanton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pleasanton at 3.8%, compared to 1.9% in Florham park.
- In Pleasanton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 49.3% compared to 42.4% in Florham park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.