Demographics details for Flomaton, AL vs Shreveport, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Flomaton, AL vs Shreveport, LA.
Data | Flomaton | Shreveport |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,458 | 180,153 |
Median Age | 32.6 years | 37.1 years |
Median Income | $37,500 | $45,967 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 21% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Flomaton vs Shreveport
- The population in Shreveport is higher at 180,153, compared to 1,458 in Flomaton.
- The median age in Shreveport is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 32.6 years in Flomaton.
- Shreveport has a higher median income of $45,967, compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Flomaton at 35.0% compared to 29.0% in Shreveport.
- The poverty level is higher in Shreveport at 21%, compared to 15% in Flomaton.
- The unemployment rate in Flomaton is higher at 5.2%, compared to 5.0% in Shreveport.
Demographics
Demographics Flomaton vs Shreveport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Flomaton | Shreveport |
---|---|---|
Black | 38 | 58 |
White | 58 | 33 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Flomaton vs Shreveport
- In Shreveport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 38% in Flomaton.
- Flomaton has a higher percentage of White residents at 58% compared to 33% in Shreveport.
- In Shreveport, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Flomaton.
- Shreveport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Flomaton.
- Both Flomaton and Shreveport have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Flomaton and Shreveport at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Flomaton | Shreveport |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.3% | 20.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 14.4% |
Depression | 24.6% | 24.4% |
Smoking | 24.1% | 24.3% |
Binge Drinking | 13.7% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 45.3% | 42.5% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Flomaton vs Shreveport
- More residents in Flomaton report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 20.2% in Shreveport.
- Depression is more prevalent in Flomaton at 24.6% compared to 24.4% in Shreveport.
- Shreveport has a higher smoking rate at 24.3% compared to 24.1% in Flomaton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Shreveport at 16.2% compared to 13.7% in Flomaton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Flomaton at 45.3% compared to 42.5% in Shreveport.
- Disability percentages are higher in Flomaton at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Shreveport.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Flomaton | Shreveport |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (2,087) |
High School Diploma | 25.0% (364) | 18.3% (33,032) |
Less than High School | 19.1% (278) | 11.1% (20,070) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.4% (137) | 18.6% (33,461) |
Education Levels Comparison: Flomaton vs Shreveport
- In Shreveport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Flomaton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Flomaton hold a high school diploma at 25.0% compared to 18.3% in Shreveport.
- More residents in Flomaton have less than a high school education at 19.1% compared to 11.1% in Shreveport.
- In Shreveport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 9.4% in Flomaton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.