Demographics details for Fleming island, FL vs Cleveland, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fleming island, FL vs Cleveland, MS.

Data Fleming island Cleveland
Population 29,810 10,545
Median Age 47.0 years 33.8 years
Median Income $117,414 $42,005
Married Families 57.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 5% 24%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 5.6

Population Comparison: Fleming island vs Cleveland

  • In Fleming island, the population is higher at 29,810, compared to 10,545 in Cleveland.
  • Residents in Fleming island have a higher median age of 47.0 years compared to 33.8 years in Cleveland.
  • Fleming island has a higher median income of $117,414 compared to $42,005 in Cleveland.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fleming island at 57.0% compared to 27.0% in Cleveland.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cleveland at 24%, compared to 5% in Fleming island.
  • Cleveland has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 2.5% in Fleming island.

Demographics

Demographics Fleming island vs Cleveland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fleming island Cleveland
Black 6 56
White 75 36
Asian 2 2
Hispanic 10 1
Two or More Races 7 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fleming island vs Cleveland

  • In Cleveland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 6% in Fleming island.
  • Fleming island has a higher percentage of White residents at 75% compared to 36% in Cleveland.
  • Both Fleming island and Cleveland have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fleming island at 10% compared to 1% in Cleveland.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fleming island at 7% compared to 5% in Cleveland.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fleming island and Cleveland at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fleming island Cleveland
Mental Health Not Good 15.3% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 8.8% 13.8%
Depression 19.8% 20.4%
Smoking 16.1% 21.0%
Binge Drinking 17.1% 12.7%
Obesity 31.2% 41.4%
Disability Percentage 11.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fleming island vs Cleveland

  • In Cleveland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.3% in Fleming island.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cleveland at 20.4% versus 19.8% in Fleming island.
  • Cleveland has a higher smoking rate at 21.0% compared to 16.1% in Fleming island.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fleming island at 17.1% compared to 12.7% in Cleveland.
  • Cleveland has higher obesity rates at 41.4% compared to 31.2% in Fleming island.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cleveland at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Fleming island.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fleming island Cleveland
No Schooling 0.4% (127) 0.9% (99)
High School Diploma 11.3% (3,358) 10.0% (1,059)
Less than High School 3.4% (1,017) 13.3% (1,404)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 34.9% (10,407) 21.3% (2,242)

Education Levels Comparison: Fleming island vs Cleveland

  • In Cleveland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Fleming island.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fleming island hold a high school diploma at 11.3% compared to 10.0% in Cleveland.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cleveland at 13.3%, compared to 3.4% in Fleming island.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fleming island hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.9% compared to 21.3% in Cleveland.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.