Demographics details for Flatwoods, WV vs Caruthersville, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Flatwoods, WV vs Caruthersville, MO.

Data Flatwoods Caruthersville
Population 258 5,295
Median Age 37.1 years 36.8 years
Median Income $51,094 $35,585
Married Families 48.0% 26.0%
Poverty Level 10% 20%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 5.6

Population Comparison: Flatwoods vs Caruthersville

  • The population in Caruthersville is higher at 5,295, compared to 258 in Flatwoods.
  • Residents in Flatwoods have a higher median age of 37.1 years compared to 36.8 years in Caruthersville.
  • Flatwoods has a higher median income of $51,094 compared to $35,585 in Caruthersville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Flatwoods at 48.0% compared to 26.0% in Caruthersville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Caruthersville at 20%, compared to 10% in Flatwoods.
  • Caruthersville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 5.0% in Flatwoods.

Demographics

Demographics Flatwoods vs Caruthersville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Flatwoods Caruthersville
Black Data is updating 40
White 87 52
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 5
Two or More Races 10 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Flatwoods vs Caruthersville

  • In Caruthersville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 0% in Flatwoods.
  • Flatwoods has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 52% in Caruthersville.
  • Both Flatwoods and Caruthersville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Caruthersville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Flatwoods.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Flatwoods at 10% compared to 3% in Caruthersville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Flatwoods and Caruthersville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Flatwoods Caruthersville
Mental Health Not Good 23.0% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good 17.1% 17.0%
Depression 30.1% 25.6%
Smoking 27.8% 28.4%
Binge Drinking 12.9% 14.6%
Obesity 41.1% 44.0%
Disability Percentage 24.0% 27.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Flatwoods vs Caruthersville

  • More residents in Flatwoods report poor mental health at 23.0% compared to 21.3% in Caruthersville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Flatwoods at 30.1% compared to 25.6% in Caruthersville.
  • Caruthersville has a higher smoking rate at 28.4% compared to 27.8% in Flatwoods.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Caruthersville at 14.6% compared to 12.9% in Flatwoods.
  • Caruthersville has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 41.1% in Flatwoods.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Caruthersville at 27.0% compared to 24.0% in Flatwoods.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Flatwoods Caruthersville
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.8% (42)
High School Diploma 42.2% (109) 23.6% (1,249)
Less than High School 5.4% (14) 23.0% (1,217)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.7% (25) 9.1% (484)

Education Levels Comparison: Flatwoods vs Caruthersville

  • In Caruthersville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Flatwoods.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Flatwoods hold a high school diploma at 42.2% compared to 23.6% in Caruthersville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Caruthersville at 23.0%, compared to 5.4% in Flatwoods.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Flatwoods hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.7% compared to 9.1% in Caruthersville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.