Demographics details for Flatwoods, WV vs Asheville, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Flatwoods, WV vs Asheville, NC.
Data | Flatwoods | Asheville |
---|---|---|
Population | 258 | 93,776 |
Median Age | 37.1 years | 40.5 years |
Median Income | $51,094 | $63,810 |
Married Families | 48.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Flatwoods vs Asheville
- The population in Asheville is higher at 93,776, compared to 258 in Flatwoods.
- The median age in Asheville is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 37.1 years in Flatwoods.
- Asheville has a higher median income of $63,810, compared to $51,094 in Flatwoods.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Flatwoods at 48.0% compared to 32.0% in Asheville.
- The poverty level is higher in Asheville at 14%, compared to 10% in Flatwoods.
- The unemployment rate in Flatwoods is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.4% in Asheville.
Demographics
Demographics Flatwoods vs Asheville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Flatwoods | Asheville |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 10 |
White | 87 | 78 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 3 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Flatwoods vs Asheville
- In Asheville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Flatwoods.
- Flatwoods has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 78% in Asheville.
- In Asheville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Flatwoods.
- Asheville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Flatwoods.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Flatwoods at 10% compared to 5% in Asheville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Flatwoods and Asheville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Flatwoods | Asheville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 23.0% | 15.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 17.1% | 10.0% |
Depression | 30.1% | 24.9% |
Smoking | 27.8% | 14.2% |
Binge Drinking | 12.9% | 18.6% |
Obesity | 41.1% | 31.8% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Flatwoods vs Asheville
- More residents in Flatwoods report poor mental health at 23.0% compared to 15.6% in Asheville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Flatwoods at 30.1% compared to 24.9% in Asheville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Flatwoods at 27.8% compared to 14.2% in Asheville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Asheville at 18.6% compared to 12.9% in Flatwoods.
- Obesity rates are higher in Flatwoods at 41.1% compared to 31.8% in Asheville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Flatwoods at 24.0% compared to 12.0% in Asheville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Flatwoods | Asheville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (558) |
High School Diploma | 42.2% (109) | 12.1% (11,316) |
Less than High School | 5.4% (14) | 8.6% (8,074) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.7% (25) | 38.9% (36,494) |
Education Levels Comparison: Flatwoods vs Asheville
- In Asheville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Flatwoods.
- A higher percentage of residents in Flatwoods hold a high school diploma at 42.2% compared to 12.1% in Asheville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Asheville at 8.6%, compared to 5.4% in Flatwoods.
- In Asheville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 9.7% in Flatwoods.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.