Demographics details for Flat rock, AL vs Seymour, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Flat rock, AL vs Seymour, IN.
| Data | Flat rock | Seymour |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,914 | 21,618 |
| Median Age | 38.0 years | 34.5 years |
| Median Income | $50,000 | $57,347 |
| Married Families | 60.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Flat rock vs Seymour
- The population in Seymour is higher at 21,618, compared to 3,914 in Flat rock.
- Residents in Flat rock have a higher median age of 38.0 years compared to 34.5 years in Seymour.
- Seymour has a higher median income of $57,347, compared to $50,000 in Flat rock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Flat rock at 60.0% compared to 32.0% in Seymour.
- Flat rock has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Seymour.
- The unemployment rate in Flat rock is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Seymour.
Demographics
Demographics Flat rock vs Seymour provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Flat rock | Seymour |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 2 |
| White | 85 | 68 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 15 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Flat rock vs Seymour
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Flat rock at 10% compared to 2% in Seymour.
- Flat rock has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 68% in Seymour.
- In Seymour, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Flat rock.
- Seymour has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 2% in Flat rock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Seymour at 11%, compared to 2% in Flat rock.
- In Seymour, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Flat rock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Flat rock | Seymour |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 18.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 12.9% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 21.5% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 42.2% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Flat rock vs Seymour
- In Seymour, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Flat rock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Seymour at 26.9% versus 0.0% in Flat rock.
- Seymour has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 0.0% in Flat rock.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Seymour at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Flat rock.
- Seymour has higher obesity rates at 42.2% compared to 0.0% in Flat rock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Seymour at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Flat rock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Flat rock | Seymour |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.6% (348) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 20.2% (4,374) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 17.4% (3,765) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 12.2% (2,648) |
Education Levels Comparison: Flat rock vs Seymour
- In Seymour, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Flat rock.
- In Seymour, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.2% compared to 0.0% in Flat rock.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Seymour at 17.4%, compared to 0.0% in Flat rock.
- In Seymour, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.2% compared to 0.0% in Flat rock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.