Demographics details for Flanagan, IL vs La crosse, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Flanagan, IL vs La crosse, WI.
| Data | Flanagan | La crosse |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,001 | 51,380 |
| Median Age | 47.2 years | 30.0 years |
| Median Income | $69,375 | $51,836 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Flanagan vs La crosse
- The population in La crosse is higher at 51,380, compared to 1,001 in Flanagan.
- Residents in Flanagan have a higher median age of 47.2 years compared to 30.0 years in La crosse.
- Flanagan has a higher median income of $69,375 compared to $51,836 in La crosse.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Flanagan at 37.0% compared to 26.0% in La crosse.
- The poverty level is higher in La crosse at 10%, compared to 0% in Flanagan.
- La crosse has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.4% in Flanagan.
Demographics
Demographics Flanagan vs La crosse provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Flanagan | La crosse |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 94 | 88 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Flanagan vs La crosse
- In La crosse, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Flanagan.
- Flanagan has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 88% in La crosse.
- In La crosse, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Flanagan.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Flanagan and La crosse at 2%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in La crosse at 4%, compared to 3% in Flanagan.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Flanagan and La crosse at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Flanagan | La crosse |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.0% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 22.5% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 16.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 23.1% |
| Obesity | 37.0% | 36.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Flanagan vs La crosse
- More residents in Flanagan report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 15.8% in La crosse.
- Higher depression rates are seen in La crosse at 25.7% versus 22.5% in Flanagan.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Flanagan at 17.4% compared to 16.8% in La crosse.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in La crosse at 23.1% compared to 18.2% in Flanagan.
- Obesity rates are higher in Flanagan at 37.0% compared to 36.9% in La crosse.
- Disability percentages are higher in Flanagan at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in La crosse.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Flanagan | La crosse |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (1) | 0.5% (232) |
| High School Diploma | 30.1% (301) | 13.6% (6,986) |
| Less than High School | 6.2% (62) | 5.3% (2,721) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.5% (125) | 20.8% (10,707) |
Education Levels Comparison: Flanagan vs La crosse
- In La crosse, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.1% in Flanagan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Flanagan hold a high school diploma at 30.1% compared to 13.6% in La crosse.
- More residents in Flanagan have less than a high school education at 6.2% compared to 5.3% in La crosse.
- In La crosse, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.8% compared to 12.5% in Flanagan.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.