Demographics details for Fitchburg, MA vs San gabriel, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fitchburg, MA vs San gabriel, CA.
| Data | Fitchburg | San gabriel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 41,502 | 38,140 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 44.3 years |
| Median Income | $65,963 | $84,056 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Fitchburg vs San gabriel
- In Fitchburg, the population is higher at 41,502, compared to 38,140 in San gabriel.
- The median age in San gabriel is higher at 44.3 years, compared to 37.6 years in Fitchburg.
- San gabriel has a higher median income of $84,056, compared to $65,963 in Fitchburg.
- In San gabriel, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 31.0% in Fitchburg.
- Fitchburg has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in San gabriel.
- The unemployment rate in Fitchburg is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.4% in San gabriel.
Demographics
Demographics Fitchburg vs San gabriel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fitchburg | San gabriel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 1 |
| White | 45 | 2 |
| Asian | 2 | 61 |
| Hispanic | 31 | 27 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fitchburg vs San gabriel
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fitchburg at 7% compared to 1% in San gabriel.
- Fitchburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 45% compared to 2% in San gabriel.
- In San gabriel, the Asian population stands at 61%, greater than 2% in Fitchburg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fitchburg at 31% compared to 27% in San gabriel.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fitchburg at 15% compared to 9% in San gabriel.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fitchburg and San gabriel at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fitchburg | San gabriel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 13.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 23.7% | 11.9% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.5% | 11.2% |
| Obesity | 34.3% | 20.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fitchburg vs San gabriel
- More residents in Fitchburg report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 13.5% in San gabriel.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fitchburg at 23.7% compared to 11.9% in San gabriel.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fitchburg at 17.2% compared to 11.0% in San gabriel.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fitchburg at 16.5% compared to 11.2% in San gabriel.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fitchburg at 34.3% compared to 20.4% in San gabriel.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fitchburg at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in San gabriel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fitchburg | San gabriel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (513) | 7.6% (2,889) |
| High School Diploma | 17.8% (7,402) | 16.2% (6,193) |
| Less than High School | 17.5% (7,254) | 21.7% (8,295) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.0% (6,621) | 26.8% (10,230) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fitchburg vs San gabriel
- In San gabriel, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 7.6% compared to 1.2% in Fitchburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fitchburg hold a high school diploma at 17.8% compared to 16.2% in San gabriel.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San gabriel at 21.7%, compared to 17.5% in Fitchburg.
- In San gabriel, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.8% compared to 16.0% in Fitchburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.