Demographics details for Fergus falls, MN vs Clayton, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fergus falls, MN vs Clayton, OH.
| Data | Fergus falls | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 14,187 | 13,235 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 46.0 years |
| Median Income | $48,738 | $89,282 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fergus falls vs Clayton
- In Fergus falls, the population is higher at 14,187, compared to 13,235 in Clayton.
- The median age in Clayton is higher at 46.0 years, compared to 42.0 years in Fergus falls.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282, compared to $48,738 in Fergus falls.
- In Clayton, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 35.0% in Fergus falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Clayton at 10%, compared to 9% in Fergus falls.
- Clayton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Fergus falls.
Demographics
Demographics Fergus falls vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fergus falls | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 30 |
| White | 93 | 61 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fergus falls vs Clayton
- In Clayton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 30% compared to 1% in Fergus falls.
- Fergus falls has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 61% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Fergus falls.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Fergus falls.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clayton at 5%, compared to 4% in Fergus falls.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fergus falls and Clayton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fergus falls | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 17.9% | 15.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 36.8% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fergus falls vs Clayton
- In Clayton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.6% in Fergus falls.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 24.4%.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fergus falls at 17.9% compared to 15.3% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fergus falls at 19.3% compared to 18.9% in Clayton.
- Clayton has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 36.8% in Fergus falls.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fergus falls at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fergus falls | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (117) | 0.2% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 14.4% (2,039) | 17.9% (2,371) |
| Less than High School | 8.3% (1,171) | 5.6% (746) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.7% (2,656) | 26.3% (3,484) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fergus falls vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Fergus falls have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.2% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 14.4% in Fergus falls.
- More residents in Fergus falls have less than a high school education at 8.3% compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 18.7% in Fergus falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.