Demographics details for Feeding hills, MA vs Los angeles, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Feeding hills, MA vs Los angeles, CA.
| Data | Feeding hills | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,937 | 3,822,238 |
| Median Age | 39.0 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $81,300 | $76,244 |
| Married Families | 70.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Feeding hills vs Los angeles
- The population in Los angeles is higher at 3,822,238, compared to 13,937 in Feeding hills.
- Residents in Feeding hills have a higher median age of 39.0 years compared to 36.5 years in Los angeles.
- Feeding hills has a higher median income of $81,300 compared to $76,244 in Los angeles.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Feeding hills at 70.0% compared to 33.0% in Los angeles.
- The poverty level is higher in Los angeles at 17%, compared to 5% in Feeding hills.
- Los angeles has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 4.5% in Feeding hills.
Demographics
Demographics Feeding hills vs Los angeles provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Feeding hills | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 9 |
| White | 92 | 16 |
| Asian | 3 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 49 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Feeding hills vs Los angeles
- In Los angeles, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 2% in Feeding hills.
- Feeding hills has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 16% in Los angeles.
- In Los angeles, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 3% in Feeding hills.
- Los angeles has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 3% in Feeding hills.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Los angeles at 13%, compared to 0% in Feeding hills.
- In Los angeles, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Feeding hills.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Feeding hills | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 12.0% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 16.1% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 29.5% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Feeding hills vs Los angeles
- In Los angeles, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Feeding hills.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Los angeles at 16.1% versus 0.0% in Feeding hills.
- Los angeles has a higher smoking rate at 11.8% compared to 0.0% in Feeding hills.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Los angeles at 14.9% compared to 0.0% in Feeding hills.
- Los angeles has higher obesity rates at 29.5% compared to 0.0% in Feeding hills.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Los angeles at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Feeding hills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Feeding hills | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 3.0% (116,335) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 12.1% (461,986) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 28.8% (1,101,987) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 26.2% (1,002,780) |
Education Levels Comparison: Feeding hills vs Los angeles
- In Los angeles, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.0% in Feeding hills.
- In Los angeles, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.1% compared to 0.0% in Feeding hills.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Los angeles at 28.8%, compared to 0.0% in Feeding hills.
- In Los angeles, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 0.0% in Feeding hills.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.