Demographics details for Federal way, WA vs Salt lake city, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Federal way, WA vs Salt lake city, UT.

Data Federal way Salt lake city
Population 97,863 204,657
Median Age 37.4 years 32.5 years
Median Income $80,360 $72,357
Married Families 39.0% 33.0%
Poverty Level 9% 13%
Unemployment Rate 5.7 3.5

Population Comparison: Federal way vs Salt lake city

  • The population in Salt lake city is higher at 204,657, compared to 97,863 in Federal way.
  • Residents in Federal way have a higher median age of 37.4 years compared to 32.5 years in Salt lake city.
  • Federal way has a higher median income of $80,360 compared to $72,357 in Salt lake city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Federal way at 39.0% compared to 33.0% in Salt lake city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Salt lake city at 13%, compared to 9% in Federal way.
  • The unemployment rate in Federal way is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.5% in Salt lake city.

Demographics

Demographics Federal way vs Salt lake city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Federal way Salt lake city
Black 17 3
White 34 63
Asian 15 5
Hispanic 19 20
Two or More Races 14 8
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Federal way vs Salt lake city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Federal way at 17% compared to 3% in Salt lake city.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Salt lake city at 63% compared to 34% in Federal way.
  • The Asian population is larger in Federal way at 15% compared to 5% in Salt lake city.
  • Salt lake city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 19% in Federal way.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Federal way at 14% compared to 8% in Salt lake city.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Federal way and Salt lake city at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Federal way Salt lake city
Mental Health Not Good 17.5% 18.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.9% 11.1%
Depression 24.7% 26.2%
Smoking 12.7% 9.2%
Binge Drinking 16.5% 14.8%
Obesity 27.2% 31.8%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Federal way vs Salt lake city

  • In Salt lake city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 17.5% in Federal way.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Salt lake city at 26.2% versus 24.7% in Federal way.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Federal way at 12.7% compared to 9.2% in Salt lake city.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Federal way at 16.5% compared to 14.8% in Salt lake city.
  • Salt lake city has higher obesity rates at 31.8% compared to 27.2% in Federal way.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Federal way at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Salt lake city.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Federal way Salt lake city
No Schooling 1.8% (1,735) 1.3% (2,733)
High School Diploma 15.3% (15,003) 9.3% (19,020)
Less than High School 11.0% (10,805) 10.5% (21,475)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.2% (20,761) 33.0% (67,504)

Education Levels Comparison: Federal way vs Salt lake city

  • A higher percentage of residents in Federal way have no formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.3% in Salt lake city.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Federal way hold a high school diploma at 15.3% compared to 9.3% in Salt lake city.
  • More residents in Federal way have less than a high school education at 11.0% compared to 10.5% in Salt lake city.
  • In Salt lake city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.0% compared to 21.2% in Federal way.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.