Demographics details for Farmington, MO vs Port huron, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Farmington, MO vs Port huron, MI.
Data | Farmington | Port huron |
---|---|---|
Population | 18,143 | 28,626 |
Median Age | 38.0 years | 39.0 years |
Median Income | $49,317 | $47,906 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 30.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 7.0 |
Population Comparison: Farmington vs Port huron
- The population in Port huron is higher at 28,626, compared to 18,143 in Farmington.
- The median age in Port huron is higher at 39.0 years, compared to 38.0 years in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher median income of $49,317 compared to $47,906 in Port huron.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Farmington at 32.0% compared to 30.0% in Port huron.
- The poverty level is higher in Port huron at 15%, compared to 14% in Farmington.
- Port huron has a higher unemployment rate at 7.0% compared to 3.2% in Farmington.
Demographics
Demographics Farmington vs Port huron provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Farmington | Port huron |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 8 |
White | 88 | 76 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 3 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Farmington vs Port huron
- In Port huron, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 6% in Farmington.
- Farmington has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 76% in Port huron.
- Both Farmington and Port huron have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Port huron has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Farmington.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port huron at 8%, compared to 2% in Farmington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Farmington and Port huron at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Farmington | Port huron |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 20.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 15.0% |
Depression | 25.3% | 28.2% |
Smoking | 25.3% | 25.7% |
Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 42.5% | 40.5% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Farmington vs Port huron
- In Port huron, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 18.5% in Farmington.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Port huron at 28.2% versus 25.3% in Farmington.
- Port huron has a higher smoking rate at 25.7% compared to 25.3% in Farmington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Farmington at 18.1% compared to 16.7% in Port huron.
- Obesity rates are higher in Farmington at 42.5% compared to 40.5% in Port huron.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port huron at 22.0% compared to 16.0% in Farmington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Farmington | Port huron |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (181) | 0.6% (172) |
High School Diploma | 22.5% (4,091) | 19.5% (5,596) |
Less than High School | 15.9% (2,876) | 13.5% (3,870) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.9% (1,980) | 12.8% (3,662) |
Education Levels Comparison: Farmington vs Port huron
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Port huron.
- A higher percentage of residents in Farmington hold a high school diploma at 22.5% compared to 19.5% in Port huron.
- More residents in Farmington have less than a high school education at 15.9% compared to 13.5% in Port huron.
- In Port huron, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.8% compared to 10.9% in Farmington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.