Demographics details for Fall river, MA vs Gresham, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fall river, MA vs Gresham, OR.
| Data | Fall river | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 93,682 | 111,621 |
| Median Age | 39.2 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $52,734 | $69,437 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.6 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Fall river vs Gresham
- The population in Gresham is higher at 111,621, compared to 93,682 in Fall river.
- Residents in Fall river have a higher median age of 39.2 years compared to 37.3 years in Gresham.
- Gresham has a higher median income of $69,437, compared to $52,734 in Fall river.
- In Gresham, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 32.0% in Fall river.
- Fall river has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 13% in Gresham.
- The unemployment rate in Fall river is higher at 5.6%, compared to 3.9% in Gresham.
Demographics
Demographics Fall river vs Gresham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fall river | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 4 |
| White | 68 | 55 |
| Asian | 3 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fall river vs Gresham
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fall river at 6% compared to 4% in Gresham.
- Fall river has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 55% in Gresham.
- In Gresham, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 3% in Fall river.
- Gresham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 12% in Fall river.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gresham at 13%, compared to 11% in Fall river.
- In Gresham, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fall river.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fall river | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.3% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 25.0% | 28.4% |
| Smoking | 23.0% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.7% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 32.8% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fall river vs Gresham
- In Gresham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 19.7% in Fall river.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gresham at 28.4% versus 25.0% in Fall river.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fall river at 23.0% compared to 17.6% in Gresham.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gresham at 20.2% compared to 16.7% in Fall river.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fall river at 32.8% compared to 28.6% in Gresham.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fall river at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fall river | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.5% (2,365) | 1.6% (1,757) |
| High School Diploma | 19.4% (18,187) | 15.0% (16,776) |
| Less than High School | 32.4% (30,324) | 16.5% (18,399) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.3% (10,601) | 16.2% (18,082) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fall river vs Gresham
- A higher percentage of residents in Fall river have no formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 1.6% in Gresham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fall river hold a high school diploma at 19.4% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
- More residents in Fall river have less than a high school education at 32.4% compared to 16.5% in Gresham.
- In Gresham, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 11.3% in Fall river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.