Demographics details for Fairview heights, IL vs Valdosta, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fairview heights, IL vs Valdosta, GA.

Data Fairview heights Valdosta
Population 16,324 55,074
Median Age 40.0 years 29.2 years
Median Income $74,038 $41,365
Married Families 36.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 9% 19%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.1

Population Comparison: Fairview heights vs Valdosta

  • The population in Valdosta is higher at 55,074, compared to 16,324 in Fairview heights.
  • Residents in Fairview heights have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 29.2 years in Valdosta.
  • Fairview heights has a higher median income of $74,038 compared to $41,365 in Valdosta.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairview heights at 36.0% compared to 25.0% in Valdosta.
  • The poverty level is higher in Valdosta at 19%, compared to 9% in Fairview heights.
  • Valdosta has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.5% in Fairview heights.

Demographics

Demographics Fairview heights vs Valdosta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fairview heights Valdosta
Black 30 56
White 54 34
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 3 5
Two or More Races 12 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fairview heights vs Valdosta

  • In Valdosta, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 30% in Fairview heights.
  • Fairview heights has a higher percentage of White residents at 54% compared to 34% in Valdosta.
  • Both Fairview heights and Valdosta have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Valdosta has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Fairview heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fairview heights at 12% compared to 4% in Valdosta.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairview heights and Valdosta at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fairview heights Valdosta
Mental Health Not Good 15.3% 19.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 15.4%
Depression 19.0% 22.2%
Smoking 15.5% 23.1%
Binge Drinking 16.8% 13.0%
Obesity 42.1% 43.5%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fairview heights vs Valdosta

  • In Valdosta, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 15.3% in Fairview heights.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Valdosta at 22.2% versus 19.0% in Fairview heights.
  • Valdosta has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 15.5% in Fairview heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fairview heights at 16.8% compared to 13.0% in Valdosta.
  • Valdosta has higher obesity rates at 43.5% compared to 42.1% in Fairview heights.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fairview heights at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Valdosta.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fairview heights Valdosta
No Schooling 1.0% (168) 1.0% (538)
High School Diploma 14.5% (2,359) 16.3% (8,967)
Less than High School 7.3% (1,187) 8.9% (4,906)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.0% (3,596) 15.9% (8,750)

Education Levels Comparison: Fairview heights vs Valdosta

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Fairview heights and Valdosta at 1.0%.
  • In Valdosta, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.3% compared to 14.5% in Fairview heights.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Valdosta at 8.9%, compared to 7.3% in Fairview heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairview heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 15.9% in Valdosta.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.