Demographics details for Fairview heights, IL vs Jackson, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fairview heights, IL vs Jackson, MI.

Data Fairview heights Jackson
Population 16,324 31,031
Median Age 40.0 years 35.0 years
Median Income $74,038 $41,988
Married Families 36.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 9% 21%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 7.9

Population Comparison: Fairview heights vs Jackson

  • The population in Jackson is higher at 31,031, compared to 16,324 in Fairview heights.
  • Residents in Fairview heights have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 35.0 years in Jackson.
  • Fairview heights has a higher median income of $74,038 compared to $41,988 in Jackson.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairview heights at 36.0% compared to 27.0% in Jackson.
  • The poverty level is higher in Jackson at 21%, compared to 9% in Fairview heights.
  • Jackson has a higher unemployment rate at 7.9% compared to 4.5% in Fairview heights.

Demographics

Demographics Fairview heights vs Jackson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fairview heights Jackson
Black 30 21
White 54 62
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 3 6
Two or More Races 12 10
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fairview heights vs Jackson

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairview heights at 30% compared to 21% in Jackson.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Jackson at 62% compared to 54% in Fairview heights.
  • Both Fairview heights and Jackson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • Jackson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Fairview heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fairview heights at 12% compared to 10% in Jackson.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairview heights and Jackson at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fairview heights Jackson
Mental Health Not Good 15.3% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 15.0%
Depression 19.0% 27.0%
Smoking 15.5% 26.4%
Binge Drinking 16.8% 14.9%
Obesity 42.1% 41.0%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fairview heights vs Jackson

  • In Jackson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 15.3% in Fairview heights.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Jackson at 27.0% versus 19.0% in Fairview heights.
  • Jackson has a higher smoking rate at 26.4% compared to 15.5% in Fairview heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fairview heights at 16.8% compared to 14.9% in Jackson.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fairview heights at 42.1% compared to 41.0% in Jackson.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jackson at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Fairview heights.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fairview heights Jackson
No Schooling 1.0% (168) 0.5% (166)
High School Diploma 14.5% (2,359) 21.1% (6,548)
Less than High School 7.3% (1,187) 14.2% (4,397)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.0% (3,596) 10.1% (3,126)

Education Levels Comparison: Fairview heights vs Jackson

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairview heights have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Jackson.
  • In Jackson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 14.5% in Fairview heights.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jackson at 14.2%, compared to 7.3% in Fairview heights.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairview heights hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 10.1% in Jackson.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.