Demographics details for Fairgrove, MI vs Stillwater, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairgrove, MI vs Stillwater, OK.
| Data | Fairgrove | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 529 | 49,160 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 23.4 years |
| Median Income | $34,583 | $39,998 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Fairgrove vs Stillwater
- The population in Stillwater is higher at 49,160, compared to 529 in Fairgrove.
- Residents in Fairgrove have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 23.4 years in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has a higher median income of $39,998, compared to $34,583 in Fairgrove.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Fairgrove and Stillwater at 25.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Stillwater at 16%, compared to 13% in Fairgrove.
- The unemployment rate in Fairgrove is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.0% in Stillwater.
Demographics
Demographics Fairgrove vs Stillwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairgrove | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 5 |
| White | 86 | 72 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairgrove vs Stillwater
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Fairgrove and Stillwater at 5%.
- Fairgrove has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 72% in Stillwater.
- In Stillwater, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Fairgrove.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Fairgrove and Stillwater at 5%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stillwater at 9%, compared to 4% in Fairgrove.
- In Stillwater, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Fairgrove.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairgrove | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 26.1% |
| Smoking | 20.6% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairgrove vs Stillwater
- In Stillwater, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.0% in Fairgrove.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stillwater at 26.1% versus 25.8% in Fairgrove.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairgrove at 20.6% compared to 19.5% in Stillwater.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairgrove at 17.8% compared to 13.6% in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 40.7% in Fairgrove.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairgrove at 27.0% compared to 11.0% in Stillwater.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairgrove | Stillwater |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (3) | 0.5% (239) |
| High School Diploma | 27.4% (145) | 6.5% (3,199) |
| Less than High School | 9.5% (50) | 3.9% (1,910) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.2% (33) | 22.5% (11,068) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairgrove vs Stillwater
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairgrove have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairgrove hold a high school diploma at 27.4% compared to 6.5% in Stillwater.
- More residents in Fairgrove have less than a high school education at 9.5% compared to 3.9% in Stillwater.
- In Stillwater, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 6.2% in Fairgrove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.