Demographics details for Fairgrove, MI vs Gallatin, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairgrove, MI vs Gallatin, TN.
| Data | Fairgrove | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 529 | 48,194 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $34,583 | $68,548 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Fairgrove vs Gallatin
- The population in Gallatin is higher at 48,194, compared to 529 in Fairgrove.
- Residents in Fairgrove have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 37.8 years in Gallatin.
- Gallatin has a higher median income of $68,548, compared to $34,583 in Fairgrove.
- In Gallatin, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 25.0% in Fairgrove.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fairgrove and Gallatin at 13%.
- The unemployment rate in Fairgrove is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.3% in Gallatin.
Demographics
Demographics Fairgrove vs Gallatin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairgrove | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 15 |
| White | 86 | 67 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairgrove vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 5% in Fairgrove.
- Fairgrove has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 67% in Gallatin.
- In Gallatin, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Fairgrove.
- Gallatin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 5% in Fairgrove.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gallatin at 7%, compared to 4% in Fairgrove.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairgrove and Gallatin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairgrove | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 27.7% |
| Smoking | 20.6% | 20.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairgrove vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 18.0% in Fairgrove.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gallatin at 27.7% versus 25.8% in Fairgrove.
- Gallatin has a higher smoking rate at 20.8% compared to 20.6% in Fairgrove.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairgrove at 17.8% compared to 14.7% in Gallatin.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairgrove at 40.7% compared to 37.2% in Gallatin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairgrove at 27.0% compared to 11.0% in Gallatin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairgrove | Gallatin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (3) | 1.2% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 27.4% (145) | 13.9% (6,695) |
| Less than High School | 9.5% (50) | 11.6% (5,600) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.2% (33) | 19.6% (9,464) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairgrove vs Gallatin
- In Gallatin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Fairgrove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairgrove hold a high school diploma at 27.4% compared to 13.9% in Gallatin.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gallatin at 11.6%, compared to 9.5% in Fairgrove.
- In Gallatin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 6.2% in Fairgrove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.