Demographics details for Fairgrove, MI vs Chino hills, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairgrove, MI vs Chino hills, CA.
| Data | Fairgrove | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 529 | 77,949 |
| Median Age | 42.4 years | 39.4 years |
| Median Income | $34,583 | $117,548 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairgrove vs Chino hills
- The population in Chino hills is higher at 77,949, compared to 529 in Fairgrove.
- Residents in Fairgrove have a higher median age of 42.4 years compared to 39.4 years in Chino hills.
- Chino hills has a higher median income of $117,548, compared to $34,583 in Fairgrove.
- In Chino hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 25.0% in Fairgrove.
- Fairgrove has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 8% in Chino hills.
- The unemployment rate in Fairgrove is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Chino hills.
Demographics
Demographics Fairgrove vs Chino hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairgrove | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 4 |
| White | 86 | 14 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 40 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairgrove vs Chino hills
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairgrove at 5% compared to 4% in Chino hills.
- Fairgrove has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 14% in Chino hills.
- In Chino hills, the Asian population stands at 40%, greater than 0% in Fairgrove.
- Chino hills has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 5% in Fairgrove.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chino hills at 13%, compared to 4% in Fairgrove.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairgrove and Chino hills at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairgrove | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.8% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 25.8% | 14.6% |
| Smoking | 20.6% | 7.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 40.7% | 28.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairgrove vs Chino hills
- More residents in Fairgrove report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 12.7% in Chino hills.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairgrove at 25.8% compared to 14.6% in Chino hills.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairgrove at 20.6% compared to 7.9% in Chino hills.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairgrove at 17.8% compared to 15.3% in Chino hills.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairgrove at 40.7% compared to 28.4% in Chino hills.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairgrove at 27.0% compared to 7.0% in Chino hills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairgrove | Chino hills |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (3) | 1.1% (849) |
| High School Diploma | 27.4% (145) | 9.6% (7,450) |
| Less than High School | 9.5% (50) | 7.2% (5,599) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.2% (33) | 34.4% (26,814) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairgrove vs Chino hills
- In Chino hills, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Fairgrove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairgrove hold a high school diploma at 27.4% compared to 9.6% in Chino hills.
- More residents in Fairgrove have less than a high school education at 9.5% compared to 7.2% in Chino hills.
- In Chino hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.4% compared to 6.2% in Fairgrove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.