Demographics details for Fairburn, GA vs Hyattsville, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairburn, GA vs Hyattsville, MD.
Data | Fairburn | Hyattsville |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,956 | 20,675 |
Median Age | 30.9 years | 35.5 years |
Median Income | $67,245 | $90,329 |
Married Families | 20.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Fairburn vs Hyattsville
- The population in Hyattsville is higher at 20,675, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
- The median age in Hyattsville is higher at 35.5 years, compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Hyattsville has a higher median income of $90,329, compared to $67,245 in Fairburn.
- In Hyattsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 11% in Hyattsville.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Fairburn and Hyattsville at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Fairburn vs Hyattsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fairburn | Hyattsville |
---|---|---|
Black | 73 | 28 |
White | 12 | 21 |
Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
Hispanic | 12 | 36 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairburn vs Hyattsville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairburn at 73% compared to 28% in Hyattsville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hyattsville at 21% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- In Hyattsville, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Fairburn.
- Hyattsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hyattsville at 7%, compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- In Hyattsville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fairburn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fairburn | Hyattsville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 13.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 9.7% |
Depression | 16.8% | 13.8% |
Smoking | 15.6% | 11.7% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 12.8% |
Obesity | 33.7% | 38.0% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairburn vs Hyattsville
- More residents in Fairburn report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 13.8% in Hyattsville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairburn at 16.8% compared to 13.8% in Hyattsville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairburn at 15.6% compared to 11.7% in Hyattsville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairburn at 15.0% compared to 12.8% in Hyattsville.
- Hyattsville has higher obesity rates at 38.0% compared to 33.7% in Fairburn.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Fairburn and Hyattsville at 7.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fairburn | Hyattsville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 3.3% (682) |
High School Diploma | 12.3% (2,082) | 10.3% (2,131) |
Less than High School | 5.7% (961) | 26.0% (5,380) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (3,591) | 33.1% (6,840) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairburn vs Hyattsville
- In Hyattsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.3% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairburn hold a high school diploma at 12.3% compared to 10.3% in Hyattsville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hyattsville at 26.0%, compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- In Hyattsville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.1% compared to 21.2% in Fairburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.