Demographics details for Fairburn, GA vs Elk grove, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairburn, GA vs Elk grove, CA.
| Data | Fairburn | Elk grove |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 16,956 | 177,558 |
| Median Age | 30.9 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $67,245 | $115,864 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Fairburn vs Elk grove
- The population in Elk grove is higher at 177,558, compared to 16,956 in Fairburn.
- The median age in Elk grove is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 30.9 years in Fairburn.
- Elk grove has a higher median income of $115,864, compared to $67,245 in Fairburn.
- In Elk grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairburn.
- Fairburn has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Elk grove.
- Elk grove has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 4.2% in Fairburn.
Demographics
Demographics Fairburn vs Elk grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairburn | Elk grove |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 73 | 11 |
| White | 12 | 27 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 30 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairburn vs Elk grove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairburn at 73% compared to 11% in Elk grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Elk grove at 27% compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- In Elk grove, the Asian population stands at 30%, greater than 0% in Fairburn.
- Elk grove has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 12% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Elk grove at 13%, compared to 3% in Fairburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairburn and Elk grove at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairburn | Elk grove |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 9.3% |
| Depression | 16.8% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 15.6% | 10.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 33.7% | 28.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairburn vs Elk grove
- More residents in Fairburn report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 14.7% in Elk grove.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Elk grove at 17.0% versus 16.8% in Fairburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairburn at 15.6% compared to 10.7% in Elk grove.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Elk grove at 15.1% compared to 15.0% in Fairburn.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairburn at 33.7% compared to 28.2% in Elk grove.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Elk grove at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Fairburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairburn | Elk grove |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (78) | 2.3% (4,155) |
| High School Diploma | 12.3% (2,082) | 10.0% (17,736) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (961) | 8.6% (15,291) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.2% (3,591) | 24.3% (43,172) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairburn vs Elk grove
- In Elk grove, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.5% in Fairburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairburn hold a high school diploma at 12.3% compared to 10.0% in Elk grove.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Elk grove at 8.6%, compared to 5.7% in Fairburn.
- In Elk grove, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.3% compared to 21.2% in Fairburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.