Demographics details for Fairborn, OH vs Los angeles, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairborn, OH vs Los angeles, CA.
| Data | Fairborn | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,977 | 3,822,238 |
| Median Age | 35.1 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $53,783 | $76,244 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 6.0 |
Population Comparison: Fairborn vs Los angeles
- The population in Los angeles is higher at 3,822,238, compared to 34,977 in Fairborn.
- The median age in Los angeles is higher at 36.5 years, compared to 35.1 years in Fairborn.
- Los angeles has a higher median income of $76,244, compared to $53,783 in Fairborn.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Fairborn and Los angeles at 33.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Los angeles at 17%, compared to 9% in Fairborn.
- Los angeles has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 5.1% in Fairborn.
Demographics
Demographics Fairborn vs Los angeles provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairborn | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 9 | 9 |
| White | 78 | 16 |
| Asian | 1 | 12 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 49 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairborn vs Los angeles
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Fairborn and Los angeles at 9%.
- Fairborn has a higher percentage of White residents at 78% compared to 16% in Los angeles.
- In Los angeles, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 1% in Fairborn.
- Los angeles has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 49%, compared to 4% in Fairborn.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Los angeles at 13%, compared to 8% in Fairborn.
- In Los angeles, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fairborn.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairborn | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.4% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 16.1% |
| Smoking | 20.5% | 11.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.3% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 29.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairborn vs Los angeles
- More residents in Fairborn report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.8% in Los angeles.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairborn at 23.4% compared to 16.1% in Los angeles.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairborn at 20.5% compared to 11.8% in Los angeles.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairborn at 16.3% compared to 14.9% in Los angeles.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairborn at 39.7% compared to 29.5% in Los angeles.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairborn at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in Los angeles.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairborn | Los angeles |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (116) | 3.0% (116,335) |
| High School Diploma | 13.2% (4,620) | 12.1% (461,986) |
| Less than High School | 12.5% (4,382) | 28.8% (1,101,987) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.4% (6,782) | 26.2% (1,002,780) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairborn vs Los angeles
- In Los angeles, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.3% in Fairborn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairborn hold a high school diploma at 13.2% compared to 12.1% in Los angeles.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Los angeles at 28.8%, compared to 12.5% in Fairborn.
- In Los angeles, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 19.4% in Fairborn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.