Demographics details for Fair oaks, CA vs Alamo, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fair oaks, CA vs Alamo, TN.
Data | Fair oaks | Alamo |
---|---|---|
Population | 32,754 | 2,317 |
Median Age | 45.7 years | 34.9 years |
Median Income | $112,138 | $50,135 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Fair oaks vs Alamo
- In Fair oaks, the population is higher at 32,754, compared to 2,317 in Alamo.
- Residents in Fair oaks have a higher median age of 45.7 years compared to 34.9 years in Alamo.
- Fair oaks has a higher median income of $112,138 compared to $50,135 in Alamo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fair oaks at 45.0% compared to 44.0% in Alamo.
- The poverty level is higher in Alamo at 14%, compared to 6% in Fair oaks.
- The unemployment rate in Fair oaks is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Alamo.
Demographics
Demographics Fair oaks vs Alamo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fair oaks | Alamo |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 9 |
White | 68 | 54 |
Asian | 5 | 1 |
Hispanic | 14 | 19 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 17 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fair oaks vs Alamo
- In Alamo, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 2% in Fair oaks.
- Fair oaks has a higher percentage of White residents at 68% compared to 54% in Alamo.
- The Asian population is larger in Fair oaks at 5% compared to 1% in Alamo.
- Alamo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 14% in Fair oaks.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Alamo at 17%, compared to 10% in Fair oaks.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fair oaks at 1% compared to 0% in Alamo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fair oaks | Alamo |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 21.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 15.7% |
Depression | 20.3% | 29.6% |
Smoking | 10.6% | 25.9% |
Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 14.1% |
Obesity | 29.9% | 38.9% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fair oaks vs Alamo
- In Alamo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 15.6% in Fair oaks.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Alamo at 29.6% versus 20.3% in Fair oaks.
- Alamo has a higher smoking rate at 25.9% compared to 10.6% in Fair oaks.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fair oaks at 17.8% compared to 14.1% in Alamo.
- Alamo has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 29.9% in Fair oaks.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Alamo at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Fair oaks.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fair oaks | Alamo |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (312) | 1.1% (25) |
High School Diploma | 9.5% (3,112) | 24.9% (577) |
Less than High School | 4.9% (1,601) | 26.1% (604) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.4% (11,579) | 7.9% (183) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fair oaks vs Alamo
- In Alamo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 1.0% in Fair oaks.
- In Alamo, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 9.5% in Fair oaks.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Alamo at 26.1%, compared to 4.9% in Fair oaks.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fair oaks hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.4% compared to 7.9% in Alamo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.