Demographics details for Fabens, TX vs Sterling heights, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fabens, TX vs Sterling heights, MI.
| Data | Fabens | Sterling heights |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,303 | 132,567 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 41.2 years |
| Median Income | $35,785 | $75,381 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 20% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Fabens vs Sterling heights
- The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 5,303 in Fabens.
- The median age in Sterling heights is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 40.5 years in Fabens.
- Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381, compared to $35,785 in Fabens.
- In Sterling heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 38.0% in Fabens.
- Fabens has a higher poverty level at 20% compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
- Sterling heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.2% in Fabens.
Demographics
Demographics Fabens vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fabens | Sterling heights |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | -21 | 79 |
| Asian | 3 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 93 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 25 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fabens vs Sterling heights
- In Sterling heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Fabens.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling heights at 79% compared to -21% in Fabens.
- In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 3% in Fabens.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fabens at 93% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fabens at 25% compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fabens and Sterling heights at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fabens | Sterling heights |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 17.7% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 24.6% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 21.1% | 19.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 42.5% | 36.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fabens vs Sterling heights
- More residents in Fabens report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 17.8% in Sterling heights.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling heights at 25.5% versus 24.6% in Fabens.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fabens at 21.1% compared to 19.8% in Sterling heights.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 13.6% in Fabens.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fabens at 42.5% compared to 36.6% in Sterling heights.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fabens at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Sterling heights.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fabens | Sterling heights |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 5.6% (296) | 2.4% (3,134) |
| High School Diploma | 13.0% (688) | 18.8% (24,937) |
| Less than High School | 57.7% (3,062) | 16.6% (22,008) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.7% (304) | 22.3% (29,518) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fabens vs Sterling heights
- A higher percentage of residents in Fabens have no formal schooling at 5.6% compared to 2.4% in Sterling heights.
- In Sterling heights, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 13.0% in Fabens.
- More residents in Fabens have less than a high school education at 57.7% compared to 16.6% in Sterling heights.
- In Sterling heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 5.7% in Fabens.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.