Demographics details for Eureka, MO vs Claremont, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eureka, MO vs Claremont, CA.
| Data | Eureka | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,729 | 36,001 |
| Median Age | 37.9 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $104,697 | $115,091 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Eureka vs Claremont
- The population in Claremont is higher at 36,001, compared to 12,729 in Eureka.
- The median age in Claremont is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 37.9 years in Eureka.
- Claremont has a higher median income of $115,091, compared to $104,697 in Eureka.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Eureka and Claremont at 42.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Claremont at 6%, compared to 5% in Eureka.
- Claremont has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.2% in Eureka.
Demographics
Demographics Eureka vs Claremont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Eureka | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | 88 | 37 |
| Asian | 2 | 16 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Eureka vs Claremont
- In Claremont, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Eureka.
- Eureka has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 37% in Claremont.
- In Claremont, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 2% in Eureka.
- Claremont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 2% in Eureka.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Claremont at 16%, compared to 8% in Eureka.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Eureka and Claremont at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Eureka | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 14.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 16.3% |
| Smoking | 14.1% | 8.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.9% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 30.0% | 24.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eureka vs Claremont
- More residents in Eureka report poor mental health at 14.2% compared to 14.0% in Claremont.
- Depression is more prevalent in Eureka at 22.8% compared to 16.3% in Claremont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Eureka at 14.1% compared to 8.2% in Claremont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Eureka at 21.9% compared to 16.7% in Claremont.
- Obesity rates are higher in Eureka at 30.0% compared to 24.5% in Claremont.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Claremont at 11.0% compared to 7.0% in Eureka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Eureka | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (403) |
| High School Diploma | 10.5% (1,337) | 6.7% (2,427) |
| Less than High School | 3.2% (405) | 6.2% (2,248) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.1% (3,835) | 39.5% (14,204) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eureka vs Claremont
- In Claremont, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Eureka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eureka hold a high school diploma at 10.5% compared to 6.7% in Claremont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Claremont at 6.2%, compared to 3.2% in Eureka.
- In Claremont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.5% compared to 30.1% in Eureka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.