Demographics details for Eubank, KY vs Fort atkinson, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eubank, KY vs Fort atkinson, WI.
Data | Eubank | Fort atkinson |
---|---|---|
Population | 323 | 12,412 |
Median Age | 33.4 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $44,205 | $72,215 |
Married Families | 53.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 17% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Eubank vs Fort atkinson
- The population in Fort atkinson is higher at 12,412, compared to 323 in Eubank.
- The median age in Fort atkinson is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 33.4 years in Eubank.
- Fort atkinson has a higher median income of $72,215, compared to $44,205 in Eubank.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Eubank at 53.0% compared to 41.0% in Fort atkinson.
- Eubank has a higher poverty level at 17% compared to 9% in Fort atkinson.
- The unemployment rate in Eubank is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.
Demographics
Demographics Eubank vs Fort atkinson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Eubank | Fort atkinson |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 100 | 89 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 8 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Eubank vs Fort atkinson
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Eubank and Fort atkinson at 0%.
- Eubank has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 89% in Fort atkinson.
- Both Eubank and Fort atkinson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Fort atkinson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 0% in Eubank.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort atkinson at 3%, compared to 0% in Eubank.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Eubank and Fort atkinson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Eubank | Fort atkinson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 15.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.6% | 10.2% |
Depression | 31.3% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 25.6% | 16.0% |
Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 23.5% |
Obesity | 40.0% | 34.0% |
Disability Percentage | 33.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eubank vs Fort atkinson
- More residents in Eubank report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 15.2% in Fort atkinson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Eubank at 31.3% compared to 23.6% in Fort atkinson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Eubank at 25.6% compared to 16.0% in Fort atkinson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 14.0% in Eubank.
- Obesity rates are higher in Eubank at 40.0% compared to 34.0% in Fort atkinson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Eubank at 33.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort atkinson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Eubank | Fort atkinson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.3% (160) |
High School Diploma | 41.2% (133) | 20.8% (2,578) |
Less than High School | 21.7% (70) | 12.9% (1,595) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.9% (3) | 19.6% (2,436) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eubank vs Fort atkinson
- In Fort atkinson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.0% in Eubank.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eubank hold a high school diploma at 41.2% compared to 20.8% in Fort atkinson.
- More residents in Eubank have less than a high school education at 21.7% compared to 12.9% in Fort atkinson.
- In Fort atkinson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 0.9% in Eubank.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.