Demographics details for Erick, OK vs Central city, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Erick, OK vs Central city, KY.
| Data | Erick | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 972 | 5,810 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $41,458 | $52,184 |
| Married Families | 26.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Erick vs Central city
- The population in Central city is higher at 5,810, compared to 972 in Erick.
- Residents in Erick have a higher median age of 35.9 years compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
- Central city has a higher median income of $52,184, compared to $41,458 in Erick.
- In Central city, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 26.0% in Erick.
- The poverty level is higher in Central city at 16%, compared to 15% in Erick.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Erick and Central city at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Erick vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Erick | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 3 |
| White | 82 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 12 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Erick vs Central city
- In Central city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Erick.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 88% compared to 82% in Erick.
- Both Erick and Central city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Erick at 12% compared to 2% in Central city.
- Both Erick and Central city have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 6%.
- In Central city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Erick.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Erick | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.0% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 28.1% | 26.8% |
| Smoking | 25.1% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.4% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 45.3% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Erick vs Central city
- More residents in Erick report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 19.3% in Central city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Erick at 28.1% compared to 26.8% in Central city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Erick at 25.1% compared to 24.8% in Central city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Central city at 14.8% compared to 13.4% in Erick.
- Obesity rates are higher in Erick at 45.3% compared to 41.9% in Central city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Erick at 21.0% compared to 15.0% in Central city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Erick | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 22.6% (220) | 15.4% (897) |
| Less than High School | 9.7% (94) | 15.6% (905) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.7% (75) | 8.3% (480) |
Education Levels Comparison: Erick vs Central city
- In Central city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Erick.
- A higher percentage of residents in Erick hold a high school diploma at 22.6% compared to 15.4% in Central city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central city at 15.6%, compared to 9.7% in Erick.
- In Central city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.3% compared to 7.7% in Erick.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.