Demographics details for Ephrata, WA vs Madisonville, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ephrata, WA vs Madisonville, TX.
Data | Ephrata | Madisonville |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,476 | 4,564 |
Median Age | 33.4 years | 38.2 years |
Median Income | $57,958 | $62,135 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Ephrata vs Madisonville
- In Ephrata, the population is higher at 8,476, compared to 4,564 in Madisonville.
- The median age in Madisonville is higher at 38.2 years, compared to 33.4 years in Ephrata.
- Madisonville has a higher median income of $62,135, compared to $57,958 in Ephrata.
- In Madisonville, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 33.0% in Ephrata.
- The poverty level is higher in Madisonville at 15%, compared to 11% in Ephrata.
- Madisonville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in Ephrata.
Demographics
Demographics Ephrata vs Madisonville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ephrata | Madisonville |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 23 |
White | 63 | 31 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 25 | 36 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ephrata vs Madisonville
- In Madisonville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 1% in Ephrata.
- Ephrata has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 31% in Madisonville.
- In Madisonville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Ephrata.
- Madisonville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 36%, compared to 25% in Ephrata.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ephrata at 11% compared to 9% in Madisonville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ephrata and Madisonville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ephrata | Madisonville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.0% | 18.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 13.1% |
Depression | 27.0% | 22.7% |
Smoking | 17.0% | 18.8% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 35.1% | 39.6% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ephrata vs Madisonville
- In Madisonville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 18.0% in Ephrata.
- Depression is more prevalent in Ephrata at 27.0% compared to 22.7% in Madisonville.
- Madisonville has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 17.0% in Ephrata.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ephrata at 17.6% compared to 16.7% in Madisonville.
- Madisonville has higher obesity rates at 39.6% compared to 35.1% in Ephrata.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Madisonville at 16.0% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ephrata | Madisonville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (65) | 2.3% (106) |
High School Diploma | 17.7% (1,503) | 13.4% (610) |
Less than High School | 14.4% (1,223) | 37.0% (1,690) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.0% (677) | 8.6% (394) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ephrata vs Madisonville
- In Madisonville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.8% in Ephrata.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ephrata hold a high school diploma at 17.7% compared to 13.4% in Madisonville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Madisonville at 37.0%, compared to 14.4% in Ephrata.
- In Madisonville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.6% compared to 8.0% in Ephrata.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.