Demographics details for Elkland, PA vs Chickasha, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Elkland, PA vs Chickasha, OK.
| Data | Elkland | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,804 | 16,549 |
| Median Age | 44.9 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $57,375 | $55,136 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 17% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Elkland vs Chickasha
- The population in Chickasha is higher at 16,549, compared to 1,804 in Elkland.
- Residents in Elkland have a higher median age of 44.9 years compared to 36.4 years in Chickasha.
- Elkland has a higher median income of $57,375 compared to $55,136 in Chickasha.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Elkland at 37.0% compared to 34.0% in Chickasha.
- The poverty level is higher in Chickasha at 17%, compared to 10% in Elkland.
- The unemployment rate in Elkland is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.2% in Chickasha.
Demographics
Demographics Elkland vs Chickasha provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Elkland | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | 96 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Elkland vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Elkland.
- Elkland has a higher percentage of White residents at 96% compared to 71% in Chickasha.
- Both Elkland and Chickasha have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Chickasha has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 2% in Elkland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chickasha at 11%, compared to 2% in Elkland.
- In Chickasha, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Elkland.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Elkland | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.9% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 22.2% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.3% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Elkland vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 18.5% in Elkland.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chickasha at 25.4% versus 24.8% in Elkland.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Elkland at 22.2% compared to 21.8% in Chickasha.
- Binge drinking is more common in Elkland at 18.3% compared to 13.8% in Chickasha.
- Chickasha has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 39.4% in Elkland.
- Disability percentages are higher in Elkland at 20.0% compared to 18.0% in Chickasha.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Elkland | Chickasha |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (4) | 0.5% (78) |
| High School Diploma | 28.4% (512) | 22.5% (3,730) |
| Less than High School | 3.8% (69) | 13.1% (2,160) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.1% (219) | 12.5% (2,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Elkland vs Chickasha
- In Chickasha, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in Elkland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Elkland hold a high school diploma at 28.4% compared to 22.5% in Chickasha.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chickasha at 13.1%, compared to 3.8% in Elkland.
- In Chickasha, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.5% compared to 12.1% in Elkland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.