Demographics details for Elk horn, IA vs Grand junction, CO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Elk horn, IA vs Grand junction, CO.

Data Elk horn Grand junction
Population 619 68,034
Median Age 49.9 years 39.9 years
Median Income $59,306 $62,993
Married Families 35.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 9% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.6 4.7

Population Comparison: Elk horn vs Grand junction

  • The population in Grand junction is higher at 68,034, compared to 619 in Elk horn.
  • Residents in Elk horn have a higher median age of 49.9 years compared to 39.9 years in Grand junction.
  • Grand junction has a higher median income of $62,993, compared to $59,306 in Elk horn.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Elk horn and Grand junction at 35.0%.
  • The poverty level is higher in Grand junction at 10%, compared to 9% in Elk horn.
  • Grand junction has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.6% in Elk horn.

Demographics

Demographics Elk horn vs Grand junction provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Elk horn Grand junction
Black Data is updating 1
White 93 73
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 5 16
Two or More Races 1 8
American Indian 1 1

Demographics Comparison: Elk horn vs Grand junction

  • In Grand junction, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Elk horn.
  • Elk horn has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 73% in Grand junction.
  • In Grand junction, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Elk horn.
  • Grand junction has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 5% in Elk horn.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grand junction at 8%, compared to 1% in Elk horn.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Elk horn and Grand junction at 1%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Elk horn Grand junction
Mental Health Not Good 14.8% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 9.0% 11.8%
Depression 18.0% 24.5%
Smoking 16.3% 17.3%
Binge Drinking 22.9% 19.2%
Obesity 35.9% 29.2%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 15.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Elk horn vs Grand junction

  • In Grand junction, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 14.8% in Elk horn.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Grand junction at 24.5% versus 18.0% in Elk horn.
  • Grand junction has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 16.3% in Elk horn.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Elk horn at 22.9% compared to 19.2% in Grand junction.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Elk horn at 35.9% compared to 29.2% in Grand junction.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grand junction at 15.0% compared to 8.0% in Elk horn.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Elk horn Grand junction
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (245)
High School Diploma 18.9% (117) 13.9% (9,476)
Less than High School 7.1% (44) 9.7% (6,605)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.3% (95) 23.8% (16,201)

Education Levels Comparison: Elk horn vs Grand junction

  • In Grand junction, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Elk horn.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Elk horn hold a high school diploma at 18.9% compared to 13.9% in Grand junction.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grand junction at 9.7%, compared to 7.1% in Elk horn.
  • In Grand junction, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.8% compared to 15.3% in Elk horn.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.