Demographics details for Elk garden, WV vs Maple valley, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Elk garden, WV vs Maple valley, WA.

Data Elk garden Maple valley
Population 214 28,220
Median Age 35.3 years 36.4 years
Median Income $78,750 $137,595
Married Families 35.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 10% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.0 4.7

Population Comparison: Elk garden vs Maple valley

  • The population in Maple valley is higher at 28,220, compared to 214 in Elk garden.
  • The median age in Maple valley is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 35.3 years in Elk garden.
  • Maple valley has a higher median income of $137,595, compared to $78,750 in Elk garden.
  • In Maple valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 35.0% in Elk garden.
  • Elk garden has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Maple valley.
  • Maple valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.0% in Elk garden.

Demographics

Demographics Elk garden vs Maple valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Elk garden Maple valley
Black Data is updating 2
White 100 74
Asian Data is updating 11
Hispanic Data is updating 5
Two or More Races Data is updating 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Elk garden vs Maple valley

  • In Maple valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Elk garden.
  • Elk garden has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 74% in Maple valley.
  • In Maple valley, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 0% in Elk garden.
  • Maple valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 0% in Elk garden.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Maple valley at 8%, compared to 0% in Elk garden.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Elk garden and Maple valley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Elk garden Maple valley
Mental Health Not Good 21.7% 15.9%
Physical Health Not Good 15.7% 8.6%
Depression 28.7% 25.8%
Smoking 25.8% 9.4%
Binge Drinking 14.3% 19.6%
Obesity 36.7% 24.3%
Disability Percentage 4.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Elk garden vs Maple valley

  • More residents in Elk garden report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 15.9% in Maple valley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Elk garden at 28.7% compared to 25.8% in Maple valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Elk garden at 25.8% compared to 9.4% in Maple valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Maple valley at 19.6% compared to 14.3% in Elk garden.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Elk garden at 36.7% compared to 24.3% in Maple valley.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Maple valley at 7.0% compared to 4.0% in Elk garden.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Elk garden Maple valley
No Schooling 0.9% (2) 0.4% (103)
High School Diploma 37.9% (81) 10.2% (2,878)
Less than High School 21.5% (46) 3.1% (879)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 1.9% (4) 28.5% (8,032)

Education Levels Comparison: Elk garden vs Maple valley

  • A higher percentage of residents in Elk garden have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Maple valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Elk garden hold a high school diploma at 37.9% compared to 10.2% in Maple valley.
  • More residents in Elk garden have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 3.1% in Maple valley.
  • In Maple valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 1.9% in Elk garden.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.