Demographics details for Elk garden, WV vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Elk garden, WV vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Elk garden | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 214 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $78,750 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Elk garden vs Coalinga
- The population in Coalinga is higher at 17,024, compared to 214 in Elk garden.
- Residents in Elk garden have a higher median age of 35.3 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Elk garden has a higher median income of $78,750 compared to $68,976 in Coalinga.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Elk garden at 35.0% compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- The poverty level is higher in Coalinga at 15%, compared to 10% in Elk garden.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.0% in Elk garden.
Demographics
Demographics Elk garden vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Elk garden | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 100 | 9 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 65 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Elk garden vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Elk garden.
- Elk garden has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- In Coalinga, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Elk garden.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 0% in Elk garden.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 0% in Elk garden.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Elk garden.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Elk garden | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.7% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.7% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 28.7% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 25.8% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 4.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Elk garden vs Coalinga
- More residents in Elk garden report poor mental health at 21.7% compared to 16.9% in Coalinga.
- Depression is more prevalent in Elk garden at 28.7% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Elk garden at 25.8% compared to 17.2% in Coalinga.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Coalinga at 15.9% compared to 14.3% in Elk garden.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 36.7% in Elk garden.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Coalinga at 13.0% compared to 4.0% in Elk garden.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Elk garden | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (2) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 37.9% (81) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (46) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 1.9% (4) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Elk garden vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.9% in Elk garden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Elk garden hold a high school diploma at 37.9% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 21.5% in Elk garden.
- In Coalinga, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.1% compared to 1.9% in Elk garden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.