Demographics details for Elizabeth, NJ vs Lancaster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Elizabeth, NJ vs Lancaster, CA.
| Data | Elizabeth | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 134,283 | 169,185 |
| Median Age | 35.7 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $59,939 | $71,367 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Elizabeth vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 169,185, compared to 134,283 in Elizabeth.
- Residents in Elizabeth have a higher median age of 35.7 years compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $71,367, compared to $59,939 in Elizabeth.
- In Lancaster, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 30.0% in Elizabeth.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 15%, compared to 12% in Elizabeth.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 5.9% in Elizabeth.
Demographics
Demographics Elizabeth vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Elizabeth | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | 21 |
| White | 11 | 10 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 66 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Elizabeth vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 18% in Elizabeth.
- Elizabeth has a higher percentage of White residents at 11% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Elizabeth.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Elizabeth at 66% compared to 46% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 18%, compared to 14% in Elizabeth.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Elizabeth and Lancaster at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Elizabeth | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.5% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 18.0% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 33.9% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Elizabeth vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.8% in Elizabeth.
- Depression is more prevalent in Elizabeth at 18.0% compared to 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Elizabeth at 17.7% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lancaster at 15.1% compared to 15.0% in Elizabeth.
- Obesity rates are higher in Elizabeth at 33.9% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Elizabeth and Lancaster at 10.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Elizabeth | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.6% (3,513) | 2.0% (3,403) |
| High School Diploma | 23.7% (31,770) | 17.5% (29,555) |
| Less than High School | 31.8% (42,757) | 21.5% (36,421) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (12,394) | 12.3% (20,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Elizabeth vs Lancaster
- A higher percentage of residents in Elizabeth have no formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 2.0% in Lancaster.
- A higher percentage of residents in Elizabeth hold a high school diploma at 23.7% compared to 17.5% in Lancaster.
- More residents in Elizabeth have less than a high school education at 31.8% compared to 21.5% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.3% compared to 9.2% in Elizabeth.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.