Demographics details for Edgerton, WI vs Sulphur, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Edgerton, WI vs Sulphur, OK.
| Data | Edgerton | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,934 | 4,951 |
| Median Age | 36.0 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $80,255 | $55,951 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Edgerton vs Sulphur
- In Edgerton, the population is higher at 5,934, compared to 4,951 in Sulphur.
- The median age in Sulphur is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 36.0 years in Edgerton.
- Edgerton has a higher median income of $80,255 compared to $55,951 in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Edgerton at 36.0% compared to 34.0% in Sulphur.
- The poverty level is higher in Sulphur at 14%, compared to 5% in Edgerton.
- Sulphur has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Edgerton.
Demographics
Demographics Edgerton vs Sulphur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Edgerton | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 82 | 60 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 10 |
Demographics Comparison: Edgerton vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Edgerton.
- Edgerton has a higher percentage of White residents at 82% compared to 60% in Sulphur.
- The Asian population is larger in Edgerton at 2% compared to 0% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 11% in Edgerton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sulphur at 16%, compared to 5% in Edgerton.
- In Sulphur, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 10%, compared to 0% in Edgerton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Edgerton | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 25.4% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 16.6% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.4% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 34.2% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Edgerton vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 14.9% in Edgerton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Edgerton at 25.4% compared to 25.3% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 16.6% in Edgerton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Edgerton at 23.4% compared to 14.6% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 34.2% in Edgerton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sulphur at 19.0% compared to 15.0% in Edgerton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Edgerton | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (70) | 1.8% (88) |
| High School Diploma | 14.2% (845) | 18.2% (899) |
| Less than High School | 12.8% (758) | 18.1% (898) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.2% (1,079) | 10.9% (542) |
Education Levels Comparison: Edgerton vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.2% in Edgerton.
- In Sulphur, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 14.2% in Edgerton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur at 18.1%, compared to 12.8% in Edgerton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Edgerton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.2% compared to 10.9% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.