Demographics details for Eddyville, IA vs Stuttgart, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Eddyville, IA vs Stuttgart, AR.
| Data | Eddyville | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 956 | 7,907 |
| Median Age | 32.4 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $59,006 | $59,124 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.0 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Eddyville vs Stuttgart
- The population in Stuttgart is higher at 7,907, compared to 956 in Eddyville.
- The median age in Stuttgart is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 32.4 years in Eddyville.
- Stuttgart has a higher median income of $59,124, compared to $59,006 in Eddyville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Eddyville at 46.0% compared to 39.0% in Stuttgart.
- The poverty level is higher in Stuttgart at 18%, compared to 10% in Eddyville.
- Stuttgart has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.0% in Eddyville.
Demographics
Demographics Eddyville vs Stuttgart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Eddyville | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 42 |
| White | 94 | 53 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Eddyville vs Stuttgart
- In Stuttgart, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 1% in Eddyville.
- Eddyville has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 53% in Stuttgart.
- Both Eddyville and Stuttgart have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Eddyville at 3% compared to 2% in Stuttgart.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stuttgart at 3%, compared to 2% in Eddyville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Eddyville and Stuttgart at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Eddyville | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 19.2% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.1% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Eddyville vs Stuttgart
- In Stuttgart, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 15.8% in Eddyville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stuttgart at 24.4% versus 19.2% in Eddyville.
- Stuttgart has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 18.2% in Eddyville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Eddyville at 21.1% compared to 13.6% in Stuttgart.
- Stuttgart has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 38.1% in Eddyville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Eddyville at 23.0% compared to 20.0% in Stuttgart.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Eddyville | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (2) | 0.8% (63) |
| High School Diploma | 31.8% (304) | 25.5% (2,015) |
| Less than High School | 3.3% (32) | 14.5% (1,144) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.4% (80) | 12.0% (948) |
Education Levels Comparison: Eddyville vs Stuttgart
- In Stuttgart, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.2% in Eddyville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Eddyville hold a high school diploma at 31.8% compared to 25.5% in Stuttgart.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stuttgart at 14.5%, compared to 3.3% in Eddyville.
- In Stuttgart, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.0% compared to 8.4% in Eddyville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.