Demographics details for Earlville, IL vs Lexington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Earlville, IL vs Lexington, NC.
| Data | Earlville | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,593 | 19,679 |
| Median Age | 34.9 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $59,028 | $36,868 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Earlville vs Lexington
- The population in Lexington is higher at 19,679, compared to 1,593 in Earlville.
- The median age in Lexington is higher at 38.6 years, compared to 34.9 years in Earlville.
- Earlville has a higher median income of $59,028 compared to $36,868 in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Earlville at 45.0% compared to 31.0% in Lexington.
- The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 15%, compared to 10% in Earlville.
- Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.0% in Earlville.
Demographics
Demographics Earlville vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Earlville | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 31 |
| White | 84 | 38 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Earlville vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 31% compared to 0% in Earlville.
- Earlville has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 38% in Lexington.
- In Lexington, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Earlville.
- Lexington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 9% in Earlville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 11%, compared to 7% in Earlville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Earlville and Lexington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Earlville | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 22.0% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 24.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 34.9% | 42.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Earlville vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.2% in Earlville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 25.0% versus 22.0% in Earlville.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 17.3% in Earlville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Earlville at 18.5% compared to 13.8% in Lexington.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 34.9% in Earlville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Earlville at 23.0% compared to 18.0% in Lexington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Earlville | Lexington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 2.7% (531) |
| High School Diploma | 25.4% (404) | 17.0% (3,355) |
| Less than High School | 17.6% (281) | 25.6% (5,036) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.8% (93) | 10.2% (2,009) |
Education Levels Comparison: Earlville vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.2% in Earlville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Earlville hold a high school diploma at 25.4% compared to 17.0% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 25.6%, compared to 17.6% in Earlville.
- In Lexington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.2% compared to 5.8% in Earlville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.