Demographics details for Earlville, IL vs Heber springs, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Earlville, IL vs Heber springs, AR.
Data | Earlville | Heber springs |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,593 | 7,201 |
Median Age | 34.9 years | 43.1 years |
Median Income | $59,028 | $50,472 |
Married Families | 45.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Earlville vs Heber springs
- The population in Heber springs is higher at 7,201, compared to 1,593 in Earlville.
- The median age in Heber springs is higher at 43.1 years, compared to 34.9 years in Earlville.
- Earlville has a higher median income of $59,028 compared to $50,472 in Heber springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Earlville at 45.0% compared to 41.0% in Heber springs.
- The poverty level is higher in Heber springs at 12%, compared to 10% in Earlville.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Earlville and Heber springs at 4.0%.
Demographics
Demographics Earlville vs Heber springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Earlville | Heber springs |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 84 | 92 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 9 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Earlville vs Heber springs
- In Heber springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Earlville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Heber springs at 92% compared to 84% in Earlville.
- Both Earlville and Heber springs have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Earlville at 9% compared to 3% in Heber springs.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Earlville at 7% compared to 3% in Heber springs.
- In Heber springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Earlville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Earlville | Heber springs |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.2% | 18.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.9% | 12.5% |
Depression | 22.0% | 26.3% |
Smoking | 17.3% | 20.5% |
Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 16.2% |
Obesity | 34.9% | 36.2% |
Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Earlville vs Heber springs
- In Heber springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.2% in Earlville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Heber springs at 26.3% versus 22.0% in Earlville.
- Heber springs has a higher smoking rate at 20.5% compared to 17.3% in Earlville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Earlville at 18.5% compared to 16.2% in Heber springs.
- Heber springs has higher obesity rates at 36.2% compared to 34.9% in Earlville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Earlville at 23.0% compared to 20.0% in Heber springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Earlville | Heber springs |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 25.4% (404) | 23.5% (1,694) |
Less than High School | 17.6% (281) | 15.1% (1,088) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.8% (93) | 10.5% (756) |
Education Levels Comparison: Earlville vs Heber springs
- A higher percentage of residents in Earlville have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Heber springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Earlville hold a high school diploma at 25.4% compared to 23.5% in Heber springs.
- More residents in Earlville have less than a high school education at 17.6% compared to 15.1% in Heber springs.
- In Heber springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.5% compared to 5.8% in Earlville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.