Demographics details for Dravosburg, PA vs Trumann, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Dravosburg, PA vs Trumann, AR.
| Data | Dravosburg | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,571 | 7,305 |
| Median Age | 47.9 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $43,208 | $37,618 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Dravosburg vs Trumann
- The population in Trumann is higher at 7,305, compared to 1,571 in Dravosburg.
- Residents in Dravosburg have a higher median age of 47.9 years compared to 40.0 years in Trumann.
- Dravosburg has a higher median income of $43,208 compared to $37,618 in Trumann.
- In Trumann, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 31.0% in Dravosburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Trumann at 13%, compared to 9% in Dravosburg.
- The unemployment rate in Dravosburg is higher at 5.2%, compared to 4.2% in Trumann.
Demographics
Demographics Dravosburg vs Trumann provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Dravosburg | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 5 |
| White | 93 | 84 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Dravosburg vs Trumann
- In Trumann, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 2% in Dravosburg.
- Dravosburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 84% in Trumann.
- Both Dravosburg and Trumann have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Dravosburg at 4% compared to 3% in Trumann.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Trumann at 8%, compared to 1% in Dravosburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Dravosburg and Trumann at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Dravosburg | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.8% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 28.5% |
| Smoking | 22.0% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.1% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 34.7% | 44.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Dravosburg vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 17.8% in Dravosburg.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Trumann at 28.5% versus 24.1% in Dravosburg.
- Trumann has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 22.0% in Dravosburg.
- Binge drinking is more common in Dravosburg at 21.1% compared to 14.4% in Trumann.
- Trumann has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 34.7% in Dravosburg.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Trumann at 24.0% compared to 21.0% in Dravosburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Dravosburg | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (43) | 1.8% (135) |
| High School Diploma | 36.2% (569) | 25.9% (1,895) |
| Less than High School | 16.0% (252) | 24.4% (1,780) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.1% (238) | 6.7% (487) |
Education Levels Comparison: Dravosburg vs Trumann
- A higher percentage of residents in Dravosburg have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.8% in Trumann.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dravosburg hold a high school diploma at 36.2% compared to 25.9% in Trumann.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Trumann at 24.4%, compared to 16.0% in Dravosburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Dravosburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.1% compared to 6.7% in Trumann.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.