Demographics details for Diamond springs, CA vs Washington, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Diamond springs, CA vs Washington, NC.
Data | Diamond springs | Washington |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,197 | 10,828 |
Median Age | 43.7 years | 48.0 years |
Median Income | $71,279 | $38,927 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 16% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Diamond springs vs Washington
- In Diamond springs, the population is higher at 12,197, compared to 10,828 in Washington.
- The median age in Washington is higher at 48.0 years, compared to 43.7 years in Diamond springs.
- Diamond springs has a higher median income of $71,279 compared to $38,927 in Washington.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Diamond springs at 44.0% compared to 34.0% in Washington.
- The poverty level is higher in Washington at 16%, compared to 11% in Diamond springs.
- Washington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.2% in Diamond springs.
Demographics
Demographics Diamond springs vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Diamond springs | Washington |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 49 |
White | 72 | 41 |
Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 18 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Diamond springs vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 0% in Diamond springs.
- Diamond springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 41% in Washington.
- The Asian population is larger in Diamond springs at 3% compared to 0% in Washington.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Diamond springs at 18% compared to 6% in Washington.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Diamond springs at 6% compared to 3% in Washington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Diamond springs and Washington at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Diamond springs | Washington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 13.8% |
Depression | 23.2% | 22.8% |
Smoking | 12.7% | 21.9% |
Binge Drinking | 19.0% | 14.7% |
Obesity | 29.1% | 43.3% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Diamond springs vs Washington
- In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 16.7% in Diamond springs.
- Depression is more prevalent in Diamond springs at 23.2% compared to 22.8% in Washington.
- Washington has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 12.7% in Diamond springs.
- Binge drinking is more common in Diamond springs at 19.0% compared to 14.7% in Washington.
- Washington has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 29.1% in Diamond springs.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 24.0% compared to 14.0% in Diamond springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Diamond springs | Washington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (73) | 1.2% (128) |
High School Diploma | 17.2% (2,093) | 19.0% (2,058) |
Less than High School | 5.8% (711) | 13.7% (1,487) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.6% (2,271) | 10.3% (1,118) |
Education Levels Comparison: Diamond springs vs Washington
- In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Diamond springs.
- In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.0% compared to 17.2% in Diamond springs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 13.7%, compared to 5.8% in Diamond springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Diamond springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 10.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.