Demographics details for Deer lodge, TN vs Lexington, NE

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Deer lodge, TN vs Lexington, NE.

Data Deer lodge Lexington
Population 135 10,725
Median Age 43.0 years 30.0 years
Median Income $35,000 $63,939
Married Families 35.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 15% 9%
Unemployment Rate 5.0 3.5

Population Comparison: Deer lodge vs Lexington

  • The population in Lexington is higher at 10,725, compared to 135 in Deer lodge.
  • Residents in Deer lodge have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 30.0 years in Lexington.
  • Lexington has a higher median income of $63,939, compared to $35,000 in Deer lodge.
  • The percentage of married families is the same in both Deer lodge and Lexington at 35.0%.
  • Deer lodge has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Lexington.
  • The unemployment rate in Deer lodge is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Lexington.

Demographics

Demographics Deer lodge vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Deer lodge Lexington
Black 3 15
White 92 4
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 5 64
Two or More Races Data is updating 15
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Deer lodge vs Lexington

  • In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 3% in Deer lodge.
  • Deer lodge has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 4% in Lexington.
  • In Lexington, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Deer lodge.
  • Lexington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 64%, compared to 5% in Deer lodge.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 15%, compared to 0% in Deer lodge.
  • In Lexington, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Deer lodge.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Deer lodge Lexington
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 13.6%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 12.0%
Depression Data is updating% 16.2%
Smoking Data is updating% 18.6%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 18.1%
Obesity Data is updating% 45.1%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Deer lodge vs Lexington

  • In Lexington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.6% compared to 0.0% in Deer lodge.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 16.2% versus 0.0% in Deer lodge.
  • Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 0.0% in Deer lodge.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Lexington at 18.1% compared to 0.0% in Deer lodge.
  • Lexington has higher obesity rates at 45.1% compared to 0.0% in Deer lodge.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lexington at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Deer lodge.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Deer lodge Lexington
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 6.2% (660)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 13.6% (1,463)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 36.3% (3,892)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 7.3% (779)

Education Levels Comparison: Deer lodge vs Lexington

  • In Lexington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 0.0% in Deer lodge.
  • In Lexington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.6% compared to 0.0% in Deer lodge.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 36.3%, compared to 0.0% in Deer lodge.
  • In Lexington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in Deer lodge.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.