Demographics details for Deep river, CT vs Zanesville, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Deep river, CT vs Zanesville, OH.

Data Deep river Zanesville
Population 4,629 24,600
Median Age 42.0 years 38.1 years
Median Income $80,000 $40,927
Married Families 59.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 5% 11%
Unemployment Rate 1.6 6.0

Population Comparison: Deep river vs Zanesville

  • The population in Zanesville is higher at 24,600, compared to 4,629 in Deep river.
  • Residents in Deep river have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 38.1 years in Zanesville.
  • Deep river has a higher median income of $80,000 compared to $40,927 in Zanesville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Deep river at 59.0% compared to 25.0% in Zanesville.
  • The poverty level is higher in Zanesville at 11%, compared to 5% in Deep river.
  • Zanesville has a higher unemployment rate at 6.0% compared to 1.6% in Deep river.

Demographics

Demographics Deep river vs Zanesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Deep river Zanesville
Black 1 9
White 95 79
Asian 2 1
Hispanic 1 3
Two or More Races 1 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Deep river vs Zanesville

  • In Zanesville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Deep river.
  • Deep river has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 79% in Zanesville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Deep river at 2% compared to 1% in Zanesville.
  • Zanesville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Deep river.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Zanesville at 8%, compared to 1% in Deep river.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Deep river and Zanesville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Deep river Zanesville
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 20.8%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.5%
Depression Data is updating% 26.7%
Smoking Data is updating% 25.8%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 16.6%
Obesity Data is updating% 47.8%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Deep river vs Zanesville

  • In Zanesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in Deep river.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Zanesville at 26.7% versus 0.0% in Deep river.
  • Zanesville has a higher smoking rate at 25.8% compared to 0.0% in Deep river.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Zanesville at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Deep river.
  • Zanesville has higher obesity rates at 47.8% compared to 0.0% in Deep river.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Zanesville at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Deep river.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Deep river Zanesville
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.6% (389)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 26.5% (6,510)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 17.8% (4,373)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 9.0% (2,214)

Education Levels Comparison: Deep river vs Zanesville

  • In Zanesville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.0% in Deep river.
  • In Zanesville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.5% compared to 0.0% in Deep river.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Zanesville at 17.8%, compared to 0.0% in Deep river.
  • In Zanesville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Deep river.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.