Demographics details for Davison, MI vs Junction city, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Davison, MI vs Junction city, KS.
Data | Davison | Junction city |
---|---|---|
Population | 5,055 | 22,264 |
Median Age | 42.3 years | 28.5 years |
Median Income | $48,750 | $60,709 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Davison vs Junction city
- The population in Junction city is higher at 22,264, compared to 5,055 in Davison.
- Residents in Davison have a higher median age of 42.3 years compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
- Junction city has a higher median income of $60,709, compared to $48,750 in Davison.
- In Junction city, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 35.0% in Davison.
- The poverty level is higher in Junction city at 13%, compared to 11% in Davison.
- Junction city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.2% in Davison.
Demographics
Demographics Davison vs Junction city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Davison | Junction city |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 20 |
White | 91 | 43 |
Asian | 1 | 3 |
Hispanic | 3 | 18 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 15 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Davison vs Junction city
- In Junction city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 1% in Davison.
- Davison has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 43% in Junction city.
- In Junction city, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Davison.
- Junction city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 3% in Davison.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Junction city at 15%, compared to 3% in Davison.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Davison and Junction city at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Davison | Junction city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.7% | 11.0% |
Depression | 27.1% | 19.2% |
Smoking | 19.2% | 18.5% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 16.6% |
Obesity | 39.5% | 41.8% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Davison vs Junction city
- More residents in Davison report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 17.1% in Junction city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Davison at 27.1% compared to 19.2% in Junction city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Davison at 19.2% compared to 18.5% in Junction city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Davison at 18.9% compared to 16.6% in Junction city.
- Junction city has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 39.5% in Davison.
- Disability percentages are higher in Davison at 22.0% compared to 16.0% in Junction city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Davison | Junction city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (13) | 1.0% (216) |
High School Diploma | 18.5% (935) | 12.4% (2,755) |
Less than High School | 12.3% (624) | 6.9% (1,535) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.8% (948) | 13.2% (2,941) |
Education Levels Comparison: Davison vs Junction city
- In Junction city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Davison.
- A higher percentage of residents in Davison hold a high school diploma at 18.5% compared to 12.4% in Junction city.
- More residents in Davison have less than a high school education at 12.3% compared to 6.9% in Junction city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Davison hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 13.2% in Junction city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.