Demographics details for Davis, OK vs Fairview heights, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Davis, OK vs Fairview heights, IL.
Data | Davis | Fairview heights |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,797 | 16,324 |
Median Age | 35.8 years | 40.0 years |
Median Income | $51,346 | $74,038 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Davis vs Fairview heights
- The population in Fairview heights is higher at 16,324, compared to 2,797 in Davis.
- The median age in Fairview heights is higher at 40.0 years, compared to 35.8 years in Davis.
- Fairview heights has a higher median income of $74,038, compared to $51,346 in Davis.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Davis at 40.0% compared to 36.0% in Fairview heights.
- Davis has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Fairview heights.
- Fairview heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Davis.
Demographics
Demographics Davis vs Fairview heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Davis | Fairview heights |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 30 |
White | 66 | 54 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 7 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 12 |
American Indian | 15 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Davis vs Fairview heights
- In Fairview heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 30% compared to 3% in Davis.
- Davis has a higher percentage of White residents at 66% compared to 54% in Fairview heights.
- In Fairview heights, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Davis.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Davis at 7% compared to 3% in Fairview heights.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fairview heights at 12%, compared to 9% in Davis.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Davis at 15% compared to 0% in Fairview heights.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Davis | Fairview heights |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.2% | 15.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.8% | 10.5% |
Depression | 26.5% | 19.0% |
Smoking | 22.8% | 15.5% |
Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 16.8% |
Obesity | 41.4% | 42.1% |
Disability Percentage | 24.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Davis vs Fairview heights
- More residents in Davis report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 15.3% in Fairview heights.
- Depression is more prevalent in Davis at 26.5% compared to 19.0% in Fairview heights.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Davis at 22.8% compared to 15.5% in Fairview heights.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fairview heights at 16.8% compared to 14.1% in Davis.
- Fairview heights has higher obesity rates at 42.1% compared to 41.4% in Davis.
- Disability percentages are higher in Davis at 24.0% compared to 14.0% in Fairview heights.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Davis | Fairview heights |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (39) | 1.0% (168) |
High School Diploma | 24.7% (691) | 14.5% (2,359) |
Less than High School | 16.0% (447) | 7.3% (1,187) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.1% (226) | 22.0% (3,596) |
Education Levels Comparison: Davis vs Fairview heights
- A higher percentage of residents in Davis have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.0% in Fairview heights.
- A higher percentage of residents in Davis hold a high school diploma at 24.7% compared to 14.5% in Fairview heights.
- More residents in Davis have less than a high school education at 16.0% compared to 7.3% in Fairview heights.
- In Fairview heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.0% compared to 8.1% in Davis.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.