Demographics details for Danville, KY vs Loves park, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Danville, KY vs Loves park, IL.
| Data | Danville | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 17,303 | 23,365 |
| Median Age | 36.4 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $48,038 | $56,370 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Danville vs Loves park
- The population in Loves park is higher at 23,365, compared to 17,303 in Danville.
- The median age in Loves park is higher at 36.6 years, compared to 36.4 years in Danville.
- Loves park has a higher median income of $56,370, compared to $48,038 in Danville.
- In Loves park, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 31.0% in Danville.
- Danville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Loves park.
- The unemployment rate in Danville is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.6% in Loves park.
Demographics
Demographics Danville vs Loves park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Danville | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 12 | 7 |
| White | 79 | 71 |
| Asian | 1 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Danville vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Danville at 12% compared to 7% in Loves park.
- Danville has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 71% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Danville.
- Loves park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 4% in Danville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Loves park at 9%, compared to 4% in Danville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Danville and Loves park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Danville | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.1% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 27.7% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 21.6% | 17.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 41.5% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Danville vs Loves park
- More residents in Danville report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.3% in Loves park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Danville at 27.7% compared to 21.3% in Loves park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Danville at 21.6% compared to 17.0% in Loves park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Loves park at 17.0% compared to 14.7% in Danville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Danville at 41.5% compared to 39.4% in Loves park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Danville at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Loves park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Danville | Loves park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (108) | 0.4% (97) |
| High School Diploma | 16.8% (2,899) | 17.1% (3,994) |
| Less than High School | 12.1% (2,102) | 9.7% (2,262) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (2,789) | 17.4% (4,064) |
Education Levels Comparison: Danville vs Loves park
- A higher percentage of residents in Danville have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 16.8% in Danville.
- More residents in Danville have less than a high school education at 12.1% compared to 9.7% in Loves park.
- In Loves park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.4% compared to 16.1% in Danville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.